![]() | ||||
|
Opening Up On Tiananmen Square and Afterwards Given at the Florida Falun Dafa Conference December 29-30, 2001 John Nania, practitioner from Minneapolis, Minnesota, US Greetings Master Li, practitioners, and guests! Before we went, we knew that going to Tiananmen Square to send forth
righteous thoughts together was something important and necessary. Each person
prepared carefully for the event, but we did not look too far beyond the event,
and there is a lesson in that, one of many lessons we are learning from our
experiences. I think that all of us who were on Tiananmen Square on November 20
are still looking inward and trying to understand the experience as cultivators.
So rather than a comprehensive report on the event, here are a few observations
and things that I have realized. I think this one sentence, from the message from Master to the Second Dafa
Conference in Russia, is quite rich with meaning during this time period:
"You should communicate with students in other countries often, encourage
each other, and progress together with diligence." I take this as a firm
instruction for all practitioners now, wherever we live. Certainly it provides
guidance for us before, during, and after our trip to Beijing. Master has mentioned on a couple of different occasions that there are
reasons that practitioners are living outside China during this time, and also
that "students outside China don't all need to go to Tiananmen." (from
"Lecture on the Fa at the Washington, D.C. International Conference")
This seemed to be a reason not to go to China, yet as I came to the decision to
go to Tiananmen and join the group there, I knew that there were many good
reasons to go, and my understanding was not that we were instructed that no one
should go. Using our rationality and wisdom to understand the Fa brought us to
the point of understanding that we could go to Tiananmen with solemn and calm
hearts, and that we should go, we must go. Going as Westerners, we knew we would
not be viewed the same way as Chinese practitioners who do the same simple and
righteous act. We would be seen and treated differently by the government
officials, by the Chinese people, and by the international media and world
community. We felt it was our obligation to use this circumstance of our
superficial characteristics--essentially our skin color in this lifetime--to do
some Fa validation. In the weeks before our journey, I took seriously this passage from the
lecture in Washington DC: "Under any circumstance, in any period, and no
matter how busy you are with your work, you can't stray from your Fa-study....
You can't do Dafa work without studying the Fa, or it would be an everyday
person doing Dafa work." It seems that all 35 practitioners who were
detained took this seriously, also, as I observed and heard about each
practitioner staying true to his or her understanding of the Fa during our time
on Tiananmen Square and our detention. There are 35 different stories of how we
reacted and what we did, and I would love to hear them all some day! I'll just repeat that the interesting point is that every practitioner's
story is very different, yet each conducted himself or herself according to
individual understanding of the Fa. In other words, our external behavior varied
dramatically and visibly. Some practitioners stayed calm and motionless, some
ran around, some called out "Falun Dafa Hao! (Falun Dafa Is Good),"
some wouldn't easily allow themselves to be taken away. While we were in
detention, some talked sincerely to police, some stayed quiet, some answered the
police's questions, some did not. Of course every practitioner searched within
afterwards to see how they could improve, but what I see is that, on the whole,
what each practitioner did was correct and necessary. I am reminded of this passage, again from the lecture in Washington:
"You are one body, just like Master's gong ...which does different
things at the same time... In other words, one body doesn't necessarily do one
thing. But no matter what you do, you need to be worthy of being called a Dafa
disciple." Looking at this varying behavior externally and from the everyday society's
viewpoint, we see some positive manifestations. If practitioners were as the
government has portrayed them, how could one act so differently from another?
Why were some doing this and others doing that? Actually, if you look at the
event from a certain standpoint, we were very disorganized in our response to
the police's actions. Yet, each person was self-disciplined and acted in a
conscientious, noble way. As the police came to know us through many hours of interrogation and
detention, I could see that they were perplexed. They must have been thinking,
"All these different people from different countries, different ages,
different professions, and behaving so differently... yet each one is obviously
a good person, a person who steadfastly stands for these principles of
Truthfulness, Compassion, and Tolerance that they talk about... how can this fit
what the government has told me about Falun Gong? Who is telling the truth
here?" Many of us had never met each other before that moment that we assembled in
Tiananmen Square. Yet each of us study the same Fa, and each of us had that Fa
to guide us in our actions. Our interpretations of the Fa assumed different
superficial forms, yet the group was harmonious. We supported each other during
the time in detention, despite any differences in our backgrounds, our
languages, or how we acted. Each person there had a role to play, we all
balanced each other. Each practitioner truly acted like a Dafa particle. There is a photograph taken of most of our group after the banner was raised
and before the police arrived. There are many interesting things about it. I was
amazed to hear the translation of the sign on the east side of Tiananmen, which
appears in the photo centered behind our group of practitioners who were born
in, live in, or are citizens of 15 different countries. Right behind our banner
with "Zhen-Shan-Ren," it is no accident that that sign says,
"Long live all the peoples of the world united together." After we were released, there were surprises awaiting us, and many tests and
tribulations. We were met at the airports by bouquets of flowers, cameras, and
reporters. This is an obvious test of our attachment to fame. For me, this was
not as difficult as understanding the reactions of other practitioners, that is,
those who did not go to Tiananmen, in the days afterwards. The reactions of many
other practitioners seemed to be one or both of the following: emotion and
excitement on the one hand, and, on the other hand, not handling the event as an
opportunity to validate the Fa, an opportunity that all practitioners can seize,
but instead handling it only as something that those 36 other practitioners did
on their own. This second reaction has puzzled me most, and there is no doubt that it
relates to my own attachments, and I will continue to search myself on this
point. But why would many practitioners view this event, which was done for the
benefit of the Fa, as an isolated event that has little to do with themselves?
Or, in another vein, why would they, with regret in their hearts, wish that they
had been one of the practitioners to go on the trip? Does it matter which
practitioners go? We knew this, we even discussed among ourselves before going
to Tiananmen, that each of us there represented millions of other practitioners.
We knew that we were supported by the powerful righteous thoughts of
practitioners all over the world at that time. Didn't those who go do it for the
benefit of everyone? Couldn't all practitioners make use of the favorable
conditions for Fa-rectification that come from the attention generated by the
event? As I puzzled over these questions, I thought that perhaps the time has not
quite arrived for certain things. One evening in group study, half of my mind
was preoccupied with this issue while half of my mind was reading along with the
group. Suddenly as we were reading, a section in lecture 8 of Zhuan Falun,
on the heavenly circuit, grabbed all my attention. This is what I read:
"The cultivation practice in our Falun Dafa avoids using this method of one
energy channel bringing hundreds of energy channels into motion. From the very
beginning, we require that hundreds of energy channels be opened up and make
simultaneous rotations." Master has mentioned that when we truly understand something in the Fa
deeply, it sounds mundane when put into the words of human language. Given this,
I cannot transmit my understanding of this passage fully, but here is a small
piece of it. For myself as an individual practitioner trying to persuade other
practitioners to act or think a certain way, or for our group of 36 in
Tiananmen, we cannot "spur into motion" a large number of other
practitioners. I understand that each individual practitioner must understand
events for himself or herself, and that a time will come in the future, possibly
soon, when many of us will simultaneously "open up" in some way. We
practitioners all over the world, as Master has said several times, are one
body. Perhaps the body referred to in this passage on the heavenly circuit could
also be understood as the body of all practitioners. As practitioners, we must balance many things. I would like to close by
quoting two passages from Master, the first from the lecture in Washington, and
the second is a repeat of the message to students in Russia, which is obviously
meant for all of us. For some people, these two passages may seem to present a
conflict between emphasis on the individual and the group. My understanding is
that they point the way to harmony and balance in our body of all practitioners: "Cultivation is an individual matter, and following the crowd won't do
it. Each person's improvement must be well-grounded." "You should communicate with students in other countries often,
encourage each other, and progress together with diligence." Thank you, Master, for all the Fa you have taught us. Posting date: 1/2/2002
|