Clearwisdom HomeNews & Media ReportsOpen ForumPractitioners' InsightsTruth Clarification
About Falun EmblemFalun Dafa WorldwidePersonal CultivationFa-Rectification StoriesScientific Findings
Welcome Note...
 
To Fellow Practitioners
on September 7
 
Article Selections
Articles with Master's Comments
Cultivation Within Fa Rectification
Righteous Beliefs and Actions
Exposing the Crimes of Jiang Zemin
Sending Forth Righteous Thoughts
Audio: Sending Forth Righteous Thoughts Formulas
Staged Tragedy: Tiananmen Self-Immolation
Prophecies
Announcements
 
Recognition & Support
Worldwide Support
Awards and Recognition
 
Photo Archive
Clearwisdom Photo Sitemap
Journey of Falun Dafa
Evidence of Persecution
 
The Persecution
513 Practitioners Killed in Persecution
SOS! Urgent Rescue
Latest News from China
Eye Witness Accounts
Solemn Declarations
Evil Deeds Provoke Retribution
How to Help
 
Download Materials
Flyers & Handouts
Publications
Information Packages
Audio/Video
Links to Other Libraries
 
Important Links
FalunDafa.org
FalunInfo.net
PureInsight.org
ClearHarmony.net
PureAwakening.net
Falun Dafa Australia Information Centre
SOS! Global RescueWalk
Friends of Falun Gong
FGM TV
 
Contact Us
Editor
Web Team
Submissions Welcome
Daily Posting Subscription
Clearwisdom Fax
 
Search - Help
  
Advanced Search
 
SCMP (South China Morning Post): New Zealand voices Article 23 fears as awareness grows overseas, SAR chiefs are questioned by a visiting justice minister

11/18/2002

Senior SAR officials have been questioned by New Zealand's minister of justice about the impact proposed anti-subversion laws may have on foreign nationals living in Hong Kong, as international awareness of the issue grows.

Phil Goff, who spoke to the South China Morning Post during a flying visit to the territory last week, said his country would keep a close watch on how the government dealt with the laws, particularly a proposal which would make permanent residents with foreign nationality liable for crimes such as treason and secession, even if committed outside Hong Kong.

"New Zealand will follow with interest how that proceeds and how that may impact upon a New Zealander who, for example, may make a comment in New Zealand that could come within that category," he added.

[...]

Four ministers were called on to put the government's case to Mr Goff, an apparent indication of how much importance the administration now places on the views of the international community. Chief Secretary Donald Tsang Yam-kuen, Secretary for Security Regina Ip Lau Suk-yee, Secretary for Justice Elsie Leung Oi-sie, and Secretary for Constitutional Affairs Stephen Lam Sui-lung all assured him he need not worry about the proposed laws on treason, sedition, subversion, and secession threatening fundamental freedoms.

Mr Goff said he had also discussed the proposed laws, currently the subject of a consultation exercise which ends on December 24, with New Zealand businessmen in Hong Kong.

"They felt it was important that there was confidence by the international community at the end of the day that the legislation was not in breach of 'one country, two systems'. But I would not describe their reaction as such that they felt the administration was trying to undermine that principle."

He felt confident the laws would not restrict basic rights, because the officials he met had assured him this would not be the case. "Each of the people we have met have reiterated the point that it is critical to Hong Kong's future that there is international confidence in the rule of law and respect for human rights," Mr Goff said.

The debate over the proposals under Article 23 of the Basic Law, which has been raging since the government released its consultation paper in September, is beginning to generate more interest overseas. Democratic Party chairman Martin Lee Chu-ming visited the US last month to raise awareness of the issue and is now in Europe highlighting concerns. US President George W. Bush spoke of the importance of preserving the rights of Hong Kong citizens last month, after meeting President Jiang Zemin, a comment analysts believe was a reference to concerns about Article 23.

Last week, the government published a legal opinion by a leading British human rights lawyer, Queen's Counsel David Pannick, in defence of its proposals, and Solicitor-General Robert Allcock has been sent to the United States to put the government's case.

Posting date: 11/20/2002
Original article date: 11/20/2002
Category: Open Forum

 Yearly Archive  Printer Version


We welcome your comments and suggestions, please email:
feedback@clearwisdom.net


Related Articles