![]() | ||||
|
SCMP (South China Morning Post): New Zealand voices Article 23 fears as awareness grows overseas, SAR chiefs are questioned by a visiting justice minister 11/18/2002
Senior SAR officials have been questioned by New Zealand's minister of
justice about the impact proposed anti-subversion laws may have on foreign
nationals living in Hong Kong, as international awareness of the issue grows. Phil Goff, who spoke to the South China Morning Post during a flying visit to
the territory last week, said his country would keep a close watch on how the
government dealt with the laws, particularly a proposal which would make
permanent residents with foreign nationality liable for crimes such as treason
and secession, even if committed outside Hong Kong.
"New Zealand will follow with interest how that proceeds and how that may
impact upon a New Zealander who, for example, may make a comment in New Zealand
that could come within that category," he added.
[...]
Four ministers were called on to put the government's case to Mr Goff, an
apparent indication of how much importance the administration now places on the
views of the international community. Chief Secretary Donald Tsang Yam-kuen,
Secretary for Security Regina Ip Lau Suk-yee, Secretary for Justice Elsie Leung
Oi-sie, and Secretary for Constitutional Affairs Stephen Lam Sui-lung all
assured him he need not worry about the proposed laws on treason, sedition,
subversion, and secession threatening fundamental freedoms.
Mr Goff said he had also discussed the proposed laws, currently the subject
of a consultation exercise which ends on December 24, with New Zealand
businessmen in Hong Kong.
"They felt it was important that there was confidence by the international
community at the end of the day that the legislation was not in breach of 'one
country, two systems'. But I would not describe their reaction as such that they
felt the administration was trying to undermine that principle."
He felt confident the laws would not restrict basic rights, because the
officials he met had assured him this would not be the case. "Each of the people
we have met have reiterated the point that it is critical to Hong Kong's future
that there is international confidence in the rule of law and respect for human
rights," Mr Goff said.
The debate over the proposals under Article 23 of the Basic Law, which has
been raging since the government released its consultation paper in September,
is beginning to generate more interest overseas. Democratic Party chairman
Martin Lee Chu-ming visited the US last month to raise awareness of the issue
and is now in Europe highlighting concerns. US President George W. Bush spoke of
the importance of preserving the rights of Hong Kong citizens last month, after
meeting President Jiang Zemin, a comment analysts believe was a reference to
concerns about Article 23.
Last week, the government published a legal opinion by a leading British
human rights lawyer, Queen's Counsel David Pannick, in defence of its proposals,
and Solicitor-General Robert Allcock has been sent to the United States to put
the government's case.
Posting date: 11/20/2002
feedback@clearwisdom.net |