Clearwisdom HomeNews & Media ReportsOpen ForumPractitioners' InsightsTruth Clarification
About Falun EmblemFalun Dafa WorldwidePersonal CultivationFa-Rectification StoriesScientific Findings
Welcome Note...
 
To Fellow Practitioners
on September 7
 
Article Selections
Cultivation Within Fa Rectification
Righteous Beliefs and Actions
Article 23 of the Hong Kong Basic Law
Exposing the Crimes of Jiang Zemin
Sending Forth Righteous Thoughts
Audio: Sending Forth Righteous Thoughts Formulas
Staged Tragedy: Tiananmen Self-Immolation
Prophecies
Articles with Master's Comments
Announcements
 
Recognition & Support
Worldwide Support
Awards and Recognition
 
Photo Archive
Clearwisdom Photo Sitemap
Journey of Falun Dafa
Evidence of Persecution
 
The Persecution
529 Practitioners Killed in Persecution
SOS! Urgent Rescue
Latest News from China
Eye Witness Accounts
Solemn Declarations
Evil Deeds Provoke Retribution
How to Help
 
Download Materials
Flyers & Handouts
Publications
Information Packages
Audio/Video
Links to Other Libraries
 
Important Links
FalunDafa.org
FalunInfo.net
PureInsight.org
ClearHarmony.net
PureAwakening.net
Falun Dafa Australia Information Centre
SOS! Global RescueWalk
Friends of Falun Gong
FGM TV
 
Contact Us
Editor
Web Team
Submissions Welcome
Daily Posting Subscription
Clearwisdom Fax
 
Search - Help
  
Advanced Search
 
Apple Daily (Hong Kong): Exposing the Deceit of Article 23: Media Could Find it Difficult to Avoid Prosecution

(Clearwisdom.net) Apple Daily reported on December 9 that Hong Kong government officials often emphasize that the legislation of Article 23 of the Basic Law will only limit itself to defining some high-level crimes that ordinary citizens would not commit. However, a large group of lawyers are standing up and writing articles to expose the government's lies. Apple Daily will briefly report the points one by one to readers.

Professor Michael C. Davis, of the Department of Government and Public Administration at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, composed a booklet entitled Comparisons between Legislation of Article 23 and Counterparts from Other Countries --- What You Must Know, in which he discussed the following concerns:

The government claims that even the most free and democratic countries have laws to prevent and punish conduct that threatens national safety and that the proposals in the consultation document are similar to or even softer than their counterparts in those countries. However, the judiciary rules of foreign countries pay attention to protecting the public's right to obtain information, and the media are able to defend themselves in the public's interests to avoid prosecution. The consultation document imposes inhibitions on the media, and moreover, it does not provide the media any way to defend itself to avoid prosecution.

Furthermore, foreign countries have different understandings of the amount of authority the police and the courts can have. During the Watergate scandal in the United States, the US Supreme Court rejected the government's request to not allow the court to investigate certain evidence when the government used the excuse of protecting state secrets. Moreover, to protect individuals' rights, the US constitution clearly states that police officers must apply for search warrants from the courts before they can search someone's home.

The Apple Daily is a prominent Hong Kong newspaper.

Posting date: 12/15/2002
Original article date: 12/14/2002
Category: News & Media Reports
Translated on 12/11/2002
Chinese version available at http://www.minghui.ca/mh/articles/2002/12/9/40692.html

 Yearly Archive  Printer Version


We welcome your comments and suggestions, please email:
feedback@clearwisdom.net


Related Articles