![]() | ||||
|
The Economist: A Jail by Another Name (Report on Forced Labor Camps in China) December 21, 2002 (Clearwisdom.net) Apart from its ten-meter wall, the Women's
Re-education Through Labor Camp in Beijing looks more like one of the modern
housing complexes favored by the capital's nouveaux riches than a correctional
facility. Its pink-colored buildings, Grecian columns, expansive lawns, rose
beds and plane trees welcomed the first inmates in March. "It feels inviting,"
enthuses the warden, Zhu Xiaoli. One of her underlings chimes in, "We don't
want to make it like a fortress. It should be lively and human." Little, however, is human about China's re-education through labour (RTL)
system. The 900-odd prisoners at Miss Zhu's $6.7m camp are serving sentences
of up to three years, entirely at the recommendation of the police without
having had a chance to defend themselves in court. Most of the inmates are
drug addicts (about 40%), followers of the Falun Gong spiritual movement (28%)
and prostitutes (about 10%). Their offences are considered too minor for
punishment in the regular prison system, whose inmates are tried in court. Yet
instead of being fined, put on probation or sentenced to community service,
they are incarcerated like convicted criminals with little difference between
their institution and a normal jail, except in this case for the architecture
and color scheme. The Beijing RTL camp happens to be a showcase for foreign
visitors. Most of the other 300-odd RTL facilities in China are
indistinguishable from prisons. The justice ministry says there are some
260,000 people now serving in the RTL system, compared with more than 1.3m in
prisons (which are often confusingly referred to as "reform through labor"
camps). The true numbers are probably greater. [Note: Experts on this
subject at the Laogai Research Foundation (http://www.laogai.org/)
have documented the existence of over 1, 000 forced labor camps, which are
believed to house between 4 and 6 million prisoners.] Bizarrely, a minor
offender could end up with more time inside than a violent criminal. The
maximum RTL sentence is three years, extendable to four for those who behave
badly. In the regular prison system, a rapist or robber could be out after
three years. China's courts, unencumbered by juries, are hardly impartial. Yet the
secretive process whereby police-dominated committees hand out RTL sentences
is especially open to abuse. Even officials admit that there is a problem. A
book of guidelines for handling RTL cases, published in China in July,
acknowledged that the sentencing procedure was not in accord with the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which China signed in
1998 but has yet to ratify. Nor, it said, was it compatible with China's own
judicial system. Some RTL committees send to labor camps even those involved
simply in immoral behavior or civil disputes. Lorne Craner, a senior American diplomat who was in China this week for talks
about human rights, said his hosts had for the first time agreed
unconditionally to invite United Nations' investigators to look into abuses,
including the jailing of citizens without due procedure. But while this was an
unusual gesture by China to a country it normally resents for pontificating on
human rights, there is little likelihood that the RTL system will be scrapped
or significantly modified any time soon. Western diplomats involved in human-rights talks with China say that a couple
of years ago indications of possible reform were somewhat more encouraging.
The Chinese have now gone quiet on reform, says one envoy. One reason, he
suggests, is the campaign against Falun Gong, which has resulted in thousands
of its followers being sent to RTL camps since 1999. This has played into the
hands of the police, who regard RTL as a useful tool for suppressing dissent
without the encumbrance of judicial bureaucracy. The courts, too, oppose any
reform that would give them a lot more cases to handle. Even abolishing RTL would leave the police with considerable power to detain
people at whim. They can send people to centers where drug rehabilitation is
carried out forcibly, and send migrants back to their registered homes. This
latter procedure often involves being detained for weeks or months and has
been increasingly abused in recent years to extract payments from rural
laborers working in the cities. Shanghai police detained 10,000 such people in
1988 (1% of the city's migrant population). By 1997 the figure had risen to
100,000, or 3.6% of those registered as living outside the city. Of those
detained, some 80% had committed no offence, according to a government study.
Writing in November 2001 in the Peking University Law Journal, Chen Ruihua, a
lecturer at the university law school, said the police should be deprived of
all their powers to impose custodial sentences. This was the only way to
progress from a police state into a state ruled by law. The police, not
surprisingly, see matters differently. Posting date: 12/22/2002
feedback@clearwisdom.net |