![]() | ||||
|
Melbourne Community Holds Rally Against Hong Kong's Article 23 Legislation (Photos) (Clearwisdom.net) On December 23rd at 5 pm, a "Keep Hong Kong
Free, Stop Article 23" Rally was held in front of the Melbourne City Hall.
The rally was organized by the Global Coalition Against Article 23, Amnesty
International, the Chinese Democratic Movement Overseas Joint Conference, the
Chinese Democratic Progressive Party, the Falun Dafa Association in Victoria,
Friends of Falun Gong in Australia and people from the academic, religious,
business circles. Nine participants delivered speeches during the rally. Mr. Lu Zhansuo, from the Chinese Democratic Movement Overseas Joint
Conference Australian Branch, said in his speech, "It has been merely five
years, and the Chinese Communist Party already wants use this legislation to
limit the Hong Kong people's opinion, and the freedom of the press and of
association, deprive them of their political rights that they have always
enjoyed, causing the once free and democratic port city to degenerate into one
that is spiritless and governed by a dictatorship. The Hong Kong authorities
ignore the fact that Hong Kong's fundamental social system started out as
totally different from that of Mainland China, and they also do not give a
thought to the people of Hong Kong's opposition. Instead the authorities are
trying to squeeze in things that are totally unclear. In fact this is seriously
undermining the Hong Kong government's bylaws. They are merely trying to be
consistent with the central government's laws. It is no longer 'One country, two
systems '. Its goal is to limit the Hong Kong people's thought, opinion and
action, and to suppress those passing in and out of Hong Kong who hold different
opinions. A government that does not accommodate objections and fears criticism
will certainly lose its legitimacy, mandate and vitality. Although it may use
the dictatorship and brute force to suppress people, to wreak havoc among the
people, but for certain it will be abandoned and defeated, and it will collapse
in the end. This crime of 'Subversion' is only another form of the charge of
being a 'counter-revolutionary' that the Chinese Communist Party has been using
for decades. This episode of Article 23 once again exposes that the Party's
habitual going back on its own words and deceiving the public. We hope that more
people of Hong Kong will maintain sober minds, display a dauntless courage, and
join the just movement of defending their own rights, thus maintaining Hong
Kong's hard-earned freedom, democracy and legal system." Ms. Robyn Kilpatrick, former president of Amnesty International Hong Kong
Branch, said, "My family and I had lived in Hong Kong for 18 and a half
years, and we had a special connection to Hong Kong. We know that many people of
Hong Kong, including those from the religious, journalistic, and legal
communities are all watching the situation of Article 23 intensely. Amnesty
International hopes that the Hong Kong SAR government will not limit basic human
rights such as the freedom of association and peaceful assembly in the name of
subversion, treason, instigating rebellion." Mr. Li Xiao Ming said on behalf of the religious community, "Everybody
knows that the religious community follows the principle of benevolence, mercy
and forgiveness, and generally does not participate in political activities and
does not oppose the government. But, the goal of Article 23 is extremely
dangerous and also extremely clear: it is to change the 'one country two
systems' policy, to implement Mainland China's dictatorship in Hong Kong,
strictly limit people's thoughts, viewpoints and the opinions, and not
permitting any dissent to the government's voice. It seriously violates the
principle of religious freedom that democratic countries in the world
extensively value. It seriously encroaches upon the religious community's right
to worship, congregate, and communicate with one another. This is why the Hong
Kong Catholic Archbishop Chen Rijun, together with Christian and Buddhist
leaders, personally went out to the streets to hold a demonstration. It is also
the reason why we from the religious community are participating in this public
assembly here today." Dr. Michele Smith, representative of the Melbourne Falun Dafa Association,
said in her speech that in China, 70 million Falun Gong practitioners were
allowed to freely practice one day, but next day they were outlawed. If Article
23 is implemented, any group could face a similar situation. The concepts of
country, government, leader, political power and nation are not distinguished
clearly. Hong Kong and Beijing would no longer operate under "one country
two systems." Beijing is extending its dictatorship to Hong Kong. Scholar Mr. Zhou Ya Hui said: "I came from Mainland China. People in
Mainland China care a great deal about the people of Hong Kong's freedom, the
legal system and their human rights. Hong Kong's Article 23 is just a part of
what the Chinese Communist Party is doing to tighten its control on the people.
Several months ago, they imprisoned some people from the democratic movement and
called them terrorists. Actually, we know that the Chinese authorities are the
world's biggest terrorists." Australia citizen and Falun Gong practitioner Katie talked about her
experiences last year. When she went to Hong Kong last year, she was imprisoned
and expatriated back to Australia by Hong Kong customs. It was clear that Hong
Kong was compelled by the Chinese authorities' pressure to expel her based on
their blacklist of Falun Gong practitioners. This happened in many countries in
the world, showing that the Jiang regime is already extending its evil reach to
many democratic countries. Last year 36 western Falun Gong practitioners from 12
countries unfurled a banner with the words
"Truthfulness-Compassion-Tolerance" on Tiananmen Square, and they were
arrested and beaten up. When they asked the police which law they violated, the
police actually said those three words are illegal. Ms. Chen Li Li from the business community said, "I am a businesswoman.
Last year I traveled to Hong Kong and China as a tourist, but I was detained by
Chinese customs for one day and one night for no reason. Recently, I'm again
preparing to go to Hong Kong to purchase equipment. If Article 23 were once
established, the nightmare I had experienced in Mainland China would repeat
itself in Hong Kong. Therefore I intensely oppose the Article 23's enactment. I
also hope that as the people of Hong Kong's personal freedom is faced with a
dire threat, every overseas Chinese person will stand up to voice their concerns
for maintaining Hong Kong's democracy and freedom." Mr. Lin Dewan from the Chinese Democratic Progressive Party and overseas
Chinese student representatives also made speeches. They indicated their
opposition to Article 23 and called on more people to join in to safeguard Hong
Kong's democracy and freedom. Posting date: 12/25/2002
feedback@clearwisdom.net |