It is said that besides concerns of obstructing the free flow of information
after the enactment of Article 23, what worries bankers most is that their
future relationship with Taiwan customers would be affected. The least influence
might be to lose Hong Kong's role as a bridge for Taiwan investment to enter the
Mainland, the worst is that the bankers may become accused of being criminals
attempting to split up the country.
Concerns of Negative Effects on Business Operations
It is reported that the Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce also received
opinions from its members, worrying that the legislation of Article 23 would
affect their cooperation with Taiwan counterparts. A high-ranking official of
the General Chamber of Commerce said, "What concerns those in business circles
is a practical matter. If we cooperate with the Taiwanese to do business in the
future and we don't know their political background, if they happen to support
Taiwan's independence, we will be likely be in violation of the new law. The
government has not been able to dispel our doubts about this at all. "
Li Guobao said the day before yesterday, some overseas bankers expressed
concerns over if the legislation of Article 23 will affect free information
flow. It shows that the overseas bankers worry that the law will affect their
business operation. The HKAB would discuss this matter at tomorrow's regular
meeting.
President of Bank of China (Hong Kong) Ltd would be Chairman of the HKAB
As for the overseas bankers' concerns over obstructing free flow of
information, some people in the banking system pointed out that banks' customers
are from all walks of life, including state-run enterprises or companies running
businesses in Mainland China. As a result, banks routinely have access to
information involving the Mainland's economy and politics. As it is difficult
for the banks to track the source of all such material, they would likely end up
in violation of the item in Article 23 about stealing the country's secrets, and
be sentenced to as long as 14 years in jail.
The Hong Kong Association of Banks is composed of licensed banks on the
island. It is the highest executive body, and comprises three note-issuing
banks, four Chinese banks and five overseas banks. Chairmanship of the HKAB
alternates among representatives of the three note-issuing banks. Chairman of
this year is Liu Jinbao, president of the Bank of China (Hong Kong) Ltd.
It is reported that overseas banks have had the strongest reaction toward
Article 23. Chinese banks remain low key.
[...]
[Note: the Chinese names above are all translated according to the way they
are spelled in Mainland China, which is slightly different from what is used in
Hong Kong]
Apple Daily is a prominent Hong Kong-based Chinese-language newspaper.
(Clearwisdom.net)
The Apple Daily reported on December 4, 2002, the Hong Kong Association of Banks
(HKAB) would have a regular meeting tomorrow. Rather unusually, the topic of the
discussion was to be the proposed enactment of Article 23 of the Basic Law,
instead of their usual topic of discussion, the economy. Chairman of the Hong
Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd expressed that the bank would not
declare its position on a political topic, but if the HKAB inquired about its
opinions, he would make a reply.
Chinese version available at
http://minghui.ca/mh/articles/2002/12/4/40428.html