![]() | ||||
|
China Would be in Danger of What? By Liang Guihao from Hong Kong
Originally published in the Apple Daily "Readers' Forum on the Proposed
Article 23 Provision" column
(Clearwisdom.net)
Lately, some Hong Kong political figures and officials have been trying their
best to promote the proposed Article 23 Provisions. They try to sell it to the
public under the name of patriotism. Actually, the goal [of the article] is
simply to strengthen the dictatorship. Is it true that China would be in danger
if this Article were not passed in Hong Kong? China would be in danger of what?
We will know just what kind of danger they are talking about if we take a look
at the rights currently enjoyed by the Hong Kong people versus those given to
the people in Mainland China under the autocracy there.
[Hong Kong is] a loophole of the dictatorship system.
China is under the dictatorship of one party. The media is controlled by the
government and is a mouthpiece of the party; it is used to abuse any person or
any group that has a different opinion than the party line. Also, there is no
effective supervision over the legislative system. So the nation is practically
ruled by certain people instead of by law. Under the autocracy, the political
figures gang up with the heads of the various businesses and industries, all the
while uncaring toward the sufferings of the workers who lose their jobs. As the
global market is evolving, the information industry is quickly developing, and
more and more things are being scrutinized; as such, some leaders of China are
terrified by the potential disclosure to the public of the corruption and the
cruelty of the party. The only way to avoid this danger is to firmly impose the
autocratic mechanism implemented in Mainland China. That is, under the name of
national security, they exploit all kinds of means to "lawfully" eliminate the
divergent voices though legal means. They use the media to cover up the facts
and only report on positive news in order to create a rosy picture. Indeed, Hong
Kong is the loophole of the dictatorship system because it has a complete
legislature structure. It empowers its people with the freedom of speech and
respects democratic values. It is a role model for a democratic system, and used
to embody the hope of promoting democracy and freedom in China. It also used to
be a good example of "One Country, Two Systems." Today, however, Hong Kong has
to be sacrificed for so-called national security reasons. This is due to firstly
the economic situation in Hong Kong that has been worsening. It's been
struggling to save itself. It might even become a burden to China. Secondly,
based on the facts of the past a few years, it is known that it is impossible to
use Hong Kong as an example to persuade Taiwan to accept the arrangement of "One
Country, Two Systems." Thirdly, the countries around the world have already
started to directly do business with Mainland China. There are many cities on
the east coast that are ready to take over the role of Hong Kong. Fourthly, it
is impossible to rule Hong Kong by some people and by law at the same time.
Instead of trying to cover up the "ruling by certain people," why not bring to
light the intention of "ruling by certain people" hidden under the name of
"protecting the nation." Fifthly, Falun Gong has become the major topic between
the world and China regarding the issues of virtue and peace. China has been
under overwhelming criticisms of the world media [because of the persecution of
Falun Gong]. Currently, Hong Kong is the only piece of land in China that
acknowledges Falun Gong's rights as a legal group. Thus, Hong Kong has become a
window of exposing the facts of the cruel persecution currently going on in
Mainland China. It is a deadly wound to the autocracy system. So Hong Kong is
now a target that the dictatorial authority will viciously fight against.
If a law is proposed for the purpose of ensuring China's security, as
responsible Chinese citizens we should step forward to support it. However, in
this case, "national security" is simply an excuse. The essence of the law is to
strengthen the privileged rights of a very small group of people, to sacrifice
the basis that keeps the Hong Kong people's lives peaceful, and to sacrifice the
freedom of speech and human rights that Hong Kong is so proud of. Hong Kong
would put itself into "white terror" by supporting such a law. Hong Kong people,
are you going to support this law? Posting date: 12/8/2002
feedback@clearwisdom.net |