![]() | ||||
|
Lord Moyne's Speech at UK Parliamentary Seminar
27th February 2002
The fact that we are all gathered here today will no doubt be carefully noted
by the Chinese Communist Government, and it is right that it should be. It shows
that the actions against the Falun Gong excite condemnation in influential
circles outside China and, together with innumerable meetings and demonstrations
in most of the rest of the world, endanger the foreign contracts which the
Chinese government want to foster for the sake of China's further progress.
The treatment of the Falun Gong is quite evidently the product of a split in
the Chinese Communist Party. Until 1999 the Falun Gong was actually encouraged.
It is not that there was proper religious freedom in China in the early 1990s,
far from it. Tibetan Buddhism was suppressed, as was Islam in the western
provinces, and the only Christianity allowed was Quisling Christianity run by
priests subservient to the atheist government. But Falun Gong was encouraged as
an outlet for the spiritual side of human nature: in itself a calculation that
was unexpectedly imaginative for a government whose philosophy excludes the
spiritual. Objectively, the Party saw that these aspirations do exist.
But since the Party denies the validity of the spirit, it can have no real
feeling for what it is all about, and this was shown in 1999. Jiang Zemin saw
that Falun Gong was becoming big and he decided that the policy of encouraging
it should be reversed. It is size that is respected and feared by materialists.
They have no conception of the inner strength of a spiritual movement and it is
this inner strength that is frustrating the Communists' attempt to suppress
Falun Gong as it frustrated Nero's attempt to suppress Christianity in ancient
Rome.
In fact the earlier tactic of the Chinese Communists was the correct one.
When not persecuted, a spiritual movement presents no danger to a secular
government. Jesus Christ told his followers to 'render unto Caesar the things
that are Caesar's' and Li Hongzhi has often made equivalent statements. Even
after the persecution started, he said the Communist government was a good
government. But this position cannot be maintained when Falun Gong is subject to
a persecution more severe than anything which happened during the Cultural
Revolution.
What can we in the West do?
Quite a bit. The Chinese Communists are by no means indifferent to world
opinion. They know that the progress of this country will be hindered and
stultified if they are isolated by world disapproval. They are seeking to
strengthen their links with the world at large: why otherwise would they have
made such efforts to secure the 2008 Olympics, why were they so delighted when
they were given them?
These very Olympic Games, if Falun Gong is still being persecuted in 2008,
will be turned into a public relations disaster for the Communists. Hundreds of
thousands of foreigners will flock to China and many of them will be Falun Gong
supporters because Falun Gong is now a worldwide movement. How will the police
search out the Falun Gong supporters from among the visitors without causing
offence to all the others? Falun Gong banners will appear from nowhere among the
spectators and feature on the television screens of the world. Some of the
performers may well stage demonstrations. What if a gold medallist practises the
exercises on the podium?
In the meantime it is important that, in every country in the world,
attention is drawn constantly to the disgraceful behaviour of the Communist
authorities to people whose practices and beliefs pose no kind of threat.
Lord Moyne
Posting date: 3/4/2002
|