|
Chinese Embassy Fails to Appear in Jakarta Courtroom to Respond to Lawsuit brought by Falun Gong Practitioners in Indonesia (Photos) By Indonesian Falun Dafa Practitioners
(Clearwisdom.net) On March 2-3, 2002, when Indonesian Falun Dafa
practitioners held lawful activities such as an Experience Sharing Conference
and parade, the Chinese embassy committed illegal acts such as disruption and
slander. On April 23, 2002, with the help of lawyer Adi Warman, the Indonesian
Falun Dafa Association filed a lawsuit against the Chinese Embassy in Indonesia
in the Southern District State Court in Jakarta.
On Thursday, June 13, 2002, the Judge of the South District State Court held
court to bring the case to trial.
More than twenty Falun Dafa practitioners wearing yellow T-shirts peacefully
attended the trial. At 12:30p.m., the judge announced the beginning of the
trial. He stated that the court would begin on time, that the plaintiff was the
Indonesia Falun Dafa Association, prosecuting through lawyer Adi Warman, and the
defendant was the Chinese embassy in Indonesia. But the Chinese embassy did not
show up. The reason given: since Falun Gong was not registered with the Chinese
embassy, they would not appear in court.
The Chinese embassy's quibbling and twisted logic was inconceivable to the
people sitting in the courtroom. The Falun Dafa Association was legally
registered with the Indonesian government. Practitioners can hold activities
freely as long as they do not violate the law. What right does the Chinese
embassy have to interfere with Falun Gong activities in Indonesia? The
Indonesian Falun Dafa Association accused the Chinese embassy of disrupting and
defaming Falun Gong practitioners' legal activities in Indonesia. Falun Gong was
first introduced to the public from China, and now more than 50 countries have
people practicing Falun Gong, and all people enjoy the right to practice.
Finally, the Judge gave his verdict, that because the Chinese embassy did not
appear in court, they had not fulfilled their responsibilities. The court would
meet again two weeks later, on Thursday, June 27, and the Chinese embassy would
be summoned to appear in court again.
Some reporters interviewed lawyer Adi Warman, who stated, "The Chinese
embassy once interfered with our country's legislative ability, and now it
harasses our trial procedures in the judiciary system. They have set a bad
precedent."
Posting date: 6/23/2002 |