![]() | ||||
|
South China Morning Post: Qian's comments do not bode well for religious groups ...
06/29/2002 ROSE WU Since the handover, the Hong Kong administration has displayed blind loyalty
towards the central Government. As a consequence, the principle of "one country, two systems" is a mere
illusion. People's fears have been exacerbated by the comments of
Vice-Premier Qian Qichen. The
development of democracy and human rights in Hong Kong during Tung
Chee-hwa's second term as Chief Executive will be retarded thanks to
Beijing. Mr Qian said he was happy for Hong Kong to continue with its existing
electoral model with functional constituency seats in the Legislative
Council. He wants the present system to remain intact instead of permitting
Hong Kong to move towards a directly-elected legislature and chief executive
after 2007. The Basic Law states there will be open consultation with the
people of the community about future elections beyond 2007. So why did Mr
Qian express his views rather than allowing the people of Hong Kong to
decide what they want? Mr Qian also said Falun Gong should be outlawed in Hong Kong if it
maintained ties with foreign groups after the enactment of an
anti-subversion law. We, as a Christian group, feel this view threatens
religious freedom in Hong Kong for all religious bodies. Most Christian
groups in the SAR, directly or indirectly, have ties with overseas churches
and mission boards. Religious freedoms in Hong Kong and those on the mainland are based on two
different standards. Forcing mainland practices on Hong Kong would not only
violate the "one country, two systems" principle, but would damage Hong Kong
as an international city. Human rights and religious freedom are respected
in an international city. Although Secretary for Justice Elsie Leung said on
Thursday that the law was "not aimed at imposing sanctions on any group" she
would not clarify whether Falun Gong would be targeted under anti-subversion
legislation. We would like to ask Mr Tung and his new ministers the following questions: Will you uphold the principle of Hong Kong's autonomy and freedom of
religion, or is your final objective to seek Beijing's approval and
blessing? Will you stand up for Hong Kong when Beijing signals the direction in which
Hong Kong is to move, especially regarding its democratic development and
respect for human rights? Whose interests do you really represent? Posting date: 6/30/2002
feedback@clearwisdom.net |