![]() | ||||
|
The Freedom Times (Taiwan): My Experience of Being Forcibly Repatriated by Hong Kong Police (Excerpt) By Zhu Wanqi
(Clearwisdom.Net)
I am a registered attorney in New York State. I work with a financial
organization that has foreign investments, and am in charge of legal issues. I
am also a Falun Gong practitioner. I would like to explain how the Hong Kong
government forcibly expelled me when I entered Hong Kong with a legal entry visa
on June 30, 2002. Since its return to China, the Hong Kong government, under
pressure from Jiang's regime, has gradually lost its democratic and legal
system, and no longer safeguards human rights.
On the afternoon of June 30, I flew alone to Hong Kong on Eva Air flight
No.1855. After the customs officer typed my name into the computer, his look
became serious. He asked me for my ticket, and pressed the red button under the
desk. Soon a policeman arrived, and took me to the administrative office. That
was when I realized that the Hong Kong government had a blacklist of Falun Gong
practitioners.
The administrative office was packed with policemen and passengers who were
being held there. I saw many familiar faces sitting quietly. These people were
from different backgrounds and walks of life, but most held one thing in common:
they were Falun Gong practitioners. We were from Taiwan, Australia, the United
States, and Japan. One practitioner told me that he had been detained there for
more than eight hours. Even some passengers who were not Falun Gong
practitioners complained that they were not allowed to enter. The police could
not give them a sound reason. A five-month-old baby had been detained for over
ten hours, just like the adults. A mother with a baby in her arms couldn't help
crying, watching her other child lying on a chair, while her husband shouted
complaints. They were detained simply because they had the same names as Falun
Gong practitioners. The Hong Kong government chose not to let them enter no
matter what the cost to human rights; however, the officers dared not explain
that it had something to do with Falun Gong.
When I was first detained, I asked to see the supervisor of the Immigration
Bureau. I told them that I was an attorney, that I was legally entering Hong
Kong, that I had no criminal record, that I had been to Hong Kong several times
without any trouble, that our company had a branch in Hong Kong, and that the
supervisor of my company's international department could prove that I was
innocent. Why couldn't I enter? A supervisor whose family name is Huang said,
"For security reasons, we cannot let you enter Hong Kong today." I
asked, "I have been to Hong Kong before. I have no criminal record, and you
have no indications that I have any criminal intention or even a suspicion of
any criminal intent. How can you have any "security reason" for not
allowing me to enter? I need to know the real reason." He mumbled,
"Hong Kong doesn't welcome you this time." I asked why he could not
tell me the real reason for refusing my entrance. He said that I should know why
in my heart, but he could not say it openly. I asked him to look at me carefully
and reply to me honestly: Am I really a bad person? Why should I be treated in
this way? He eventually said to me, "I know that you are not bad people.
This is not your fault. I am the one in a wrong position."
I knew clearly in my heart that they could only use the "security
reason" excuse and not reveal the fact that it was because of Falun Gong.
Since Falun Gong is a legal organization in Hong Kong, and its activities are
legal as well, it is not reasonable from the point of law and justice to block
Falun Gong practitioners from entering Hong Kong to attend legally approved
activities. Nor is it reasonable to hold them because of a blacklist created
because of Jiang's political pressure, due to his fear of Falun Gong. The
officer at the Immigration Bureau could not tell me the real reason. In carrying
out this task, he didn't know how to reply to us, because he knew that justice
was not on their side. The officer's supervisor told me in private that we might
be able to enter Hong Kong after July 5, but he could not guarantee it.
At the moment, they tried to repatriate two female practitioners from
Australia. The two practitioners would not go voluntarily. Therefore, they
intended to put the two practitioners into burlap sacks and carry them to the
plane (two practitioners from Taiwan had been expelled this way). Male
practitioners from Australia stopped them and said loudly, "Police cannot
be so rude." Before that, the police had confiscated a Japanese
practitioner's tape recorder in order not to leave any record of their
brutality. I then turned to the seven or eight policemen on the spot and said,
"Look at this lady. Why doesn't she want to leave? Because she didn't do
anything wrong. You have no idea that she might do anything to damage Hong
Kong's social order. Why do you treat her so rudely?" None of the policemen
present responded. Their faces showed indifference. In the end, the two female
practitioners were forcibly carried away.
At 8 p.m., the officer from the Immigration Bureau said to me, "You
cannot enter Hong Kong today. We'll repatriate you to Taipei." I answered,
"I will agree to leave if you will listen to me for ten minutes." He
nodded his head and I explained, "I had a tumor three years ago. It
disappeared without the use of any medicine after I practiced Falun Gong. Ever
since then, I have become stronger, healthier, and more peaceful in my mind.
Ever since then, I, as a woman, have been to many countries to teach people
Falun Gong with only one wish: that everybody can be healthy and be a good
person. Every country welcomes us. It is not reasonable for Hong Kong to treat
us like this today under pressure from the Chinese government. I sincerely hope
that you are healthy and peaceful as well." He appreciated my remarks and
replied, "If I tell the real reason, I'll lose my job. With this uniform
on, I have to obey orders. At my age, I am clear in my heart about the truth.
You are not being expelled because you are bad." I asked him to think about
it again after he took off his uniform, explaining, "It is wrong to expel a
group of good people who cultivate Truthfulness-Compassion-Tolerance. Even
though you don't practice Falun Gong, you should be able to distinguish between
right and wrong. You should place Truthfulness-Compassion-Tolerance in your
heart and become a truly good person.
He lowered his head and dared not look at me.
The policemen then examined my luggage. They told me everything was fine with
my luggage. I then held two pieces of my luggage up and spoke loudly to the
policemen standing nearby and outside the gate, "You have just examined my
luggage, and didn't find a gun, a shell or any forbidden things. Remember, it is
wrong for you to expel a good person who has done nothing wrong. It is the fault
of your government and Jiang, who made you commit such a wrongful act because of
his own personal political desires." The policemen were silent and didn't
touch me. Together with five Taiwanese passengers who were not Falun Gong
practitioners, I returned to Taipei, taking the evening flight.
Both Hong Kong and Taiwan are societies with democratic legal systems. I
should have confidence in Hong Kong's rule of law; however, I have seen a
difference in the last two years in how the Hong Kong government treats the
local legal Falun Gong organization, Falun Gong practitioners, and even Falun
Gong practitioners from Taiwan and other countries who have gone to Hong Kong to
attend legal activities held there.
Over the past half century, Hong Kong has had a good reputation
internationally, as the people of Hong Kong have safeguarded their democratic
and legal systems. The spirit of "one country, two systems" that has
been maintained since 1997 should not be sacrificed simply to satisfy Jiang's
personal quest. What is being sacrificed is not simply the freedom of Hong Kong
Falun Gong practitioners' beliefs and freedom of assembly, but the confidence of
the entire international community in Hong Kong's adherence to a democratic and
legal system.
Posting date: 7/13/2002
feedback@clearwisdom.net |