![]() | ||||
|
Human Rights Watch: The Falun Gong: New Targets of Psychiatric Abuse [Excerpt]
The authorities in the former Soviet Union employed political psychiatry
against a wide range of different types of people: political dissidents,
religious sectarians and spiritual nonconformists, ethnic nationalists, labor
rights activists, and Jewish people seeking emigration to Israel, among others.
In China, the principal known target of such treatment since 1949 has been
political activists of various kinds, together with a variety of people accused
of "disturbing public order," such as petitioners, complainants,
"whistleblowers" and "litigious maniacs." Our current lack
of detailed information on individual cases does not, however, necessarily mean
that people of other types and categories, similar to those seen in the former
Soviet case, have not also been subjected to compulsory psychiatric treatment
and hospitalization in China. For example, several cases of Chinese labor
activists being dealt with in this manner have just recently come to light.
Since the latter part of 1999, however, it has become abundantly clear that
religious sectarians now also form a major target of politically repressive
psychiatry in China.
In April 1999, a [...] numerically large spiritual
community in China calling itself the Falun Dafa (Great Wheel of Buddha's
Law) or Falun Gong (Cultivation of the Wheel of the Law)
staged an unannounced peaceful protest demonstration outside
Zhongnanhai, the main Communist Party leadership compound in central Beijing. [Editor's note: It was not a demonstration. Those practitioners simply went to appeal to the Appeal Office of the Council of State Affairs, which happens to be near Zhongnanhai.]
According to reports, more than 10,000 practitioners from the group, whose
devotional activities center on the practice of a traditional form of Chinese
physical and mental exercises known as qigong, took part in the silent,
day-long vigil. The source of their dissatisfaction was an escalating campaign
of official criticism of the Falun Gong movement, and of its leader, a
middle-aged former government official named Li Hongzhi. [Editor's note: They appealed because the police in Tianjin city unlawfully detained and beated 40 some Falun Gong practitioners and local authorities told them only the Central Government can solve the issue.] The public
demonstration was the largest held in China since the Tiananmen protests of May
1989, and it apparently caught the government's security services completely by
surprise. A flurry of official condemnations quickly followed, but no overt
action was taken against the Falun Gong until July 19-20, when dozens of the
group's leading organizers and practitioners were suddenly arrested by police in
the middle of the night. Two days later, and thus retroactively, as far as those
already detained were concerned, the government announced that the Falun Gong
was a proscribed organization and that it was to immediately cease all
activities throughout the country. Since then, tens of thousands of
practitioners nationwide have been detained, arrested, sent to jail or labor
camps for periods of several weeks or years, or formally charged and sentenced
to terms of up to 18 years' imprisonment. As of November 2000, reports indicate
that more than seventy detained practitioners have died as a result of torture
or severe ill treatment at the hands of the authorities. Despite this harsh
campaign of governmental repression, thousands of Falun Gong practitioners have
continued, on an almost daily basis, to travel to Beijing and other major cities
to stage peaceful protests against the continuing crackdown; they are invariably
arrested within moments and carted off to police holding centers to await their
punishment.
The most distinctive aspect of the government's protracted campaign to crush
the Falun Gong, aside from its sheer scope and brutality, has been the flood of
reports that began emerging in the latter half of 1999 indicating that large
numbers of the group's detained practitioners were being forcibly sent to mental
hospitals by the security authorities. By late 2000, overseas Falun Gong support
groups had documented well over a hundred such cases where the names and other
details of the victims were known, while overall estimates of the total number
dealt with by the authorities in this way had risen to around six hundred. These
various reports have not yet been independently confirmed by international human
rights groups or similar organizations, and instances of factual error or
misreporting may eventually come to light, however, there is presently no reason
or evidence for doubting their overall veracity. Certainly, numerous Western
journalists who have witnessed police raids on Falun Gong demonstrators, in
Beijing and elsewhere, have frequently reported seeing detainees being severely
beaten up in front of their own eyes, so there is no grounds for believing that
such people receive any more humane treatment after their removal from the
public arena. The accounts of the treatment meted out to detained practitioners in mental
asylums around the country make frequent and consistent reference to the
following kinds of practices: people are drugged with various unknown kinds of
medication, tied with ropes to hospital beds or put under other forms of
physical restraint, kept in dark hospital rooms for long periods, subjected to
electro-convulsive therapy or painful forms of electrical acupuncture treatment,
denied adequate food and water and allowed only restricted access to toilet
facilities, forced to write confessional statements renouncing their belief in
Falun Gong as a precondition of their eventual release, and then required to pay
fines or unreceipted charges of several thousand yuan for their board and
treatment in the hospital. Many have been held in mental asylums since the late
summer and fall of 1999, when the news of this form of repressive treatment was
first reported. Among the currently known victims have been university
professors, medical workers, government functionaries, members of the police and
armed forces (including several senior officers), farmers, students, housewives,
and a judge. Three of those sent forcibly to mental asylums are reported to have
died as a direct consequence of the ill treatment they received there. Thus far,
it appears that Falun Gong practitioners subjected to this treatment have been
sent to regular mental hospitals rather than to Ankang custodial facilities; the
main reason for this is probably that most Chinese cities do not yet possess any
such specialized psychiatric detention facilities. Many outside observers,
however, have found the Chinese government's continuing campaign against the
Falun Gong to be closely reminiscent of the kinds of extreme and unbridled
political campaigns waged by the Party during the Cultural Revolution. In this
connection, it should be noted that the security authorities' current practice
of detaining Falun Gong practitioners in normal psychiatric institutions, rather
than going through the due process normally required for forensic committals,
certainly appears to be a worrying reversion to the widespread pattern of
arbitrary political-psychiatric abuse that prevailed during the Cultural
Revolution.
[...]
The full version of the report can be viewed at:
http://hrw.org/reports/2002/china02/china0802-11.htm#P1320_428651
Posting date: 8/18/2002
feedback@clearwisdom.net |