BBC Monitoring Asia Pacific - Political
Supplied by BBC Worldwide Monitoring
September 16, 2002, Monday
SOURCE: Sunday Morning Post, Hong Kong, in English 15 Sep 02
Text of editorial entitled: 'End the guessing game', published by a Hong Kong newspaper Sunday
Morning Post on 15 September.
While many of the fears expressed before the handover about threats to the freedoms of Hong Kong
have not materialized, one in particular has continued to be a major source of concern.
Article 23 of the Basic Law, which calls on the SAR Special Administrative Region to pass laws to
protect the central government from treason, sedition, subversion and secession, has long cast a
shadow over the administration of Hong Kong under 'one country, two systems'.
By their very nature, the proposed laws give rise to concerns they will be used to restrict freedom
of expression and crack down on groups targeted by Beijing, such as the Falun Gong. The shadow
loomed larger than ever last week as it became clear that these laws are finally on the way. A
government consultation paper could be released as early as next month.
As the moment of truth nears, there has been much speculation, rumor and comment on the content of
the proposals. Some reports have fuelled concern, suggesting, for example, that mass media may be
prosecuted for advancing opinions, such as independence for Taiwan, over a prolonged period of time.
Others were more reassuring, promising that international principles
safeguarding human rights would be referred to.
With the government refusing to comment on what is in the consultation paper, the picture which
emerges is very unclear. This can only add to the uncertainty which Article 23 engenders.
Secretary for Justice Elsie Leung Oi-sie has sought to calm fears, stressing that freedom of
expression will be protected. But she has also spoken of circumstances in which some forms of
expression may constitute a crime, further muddying the waters.
The consultation paper should therefore be published as soon as possible, putting a stop to the
guessing game. Given the sensitive nature of this issue, it is important that sufficient time be
given to the consultation process, and that the government listen carefully to the views expressed.
There is little, if any, evidence that Hong Kong needs these laws. The SAR can hardly be described
as a hotbed of subversive activity. But the Basic Law states that Hong Kong 'shall' pass such
legislation and do so 'on its own'. It is difficult to see such a step being put off forever.
The best way forward may, therefore, be to implement the legislation, but in a way which ensures
that any restriction on freedoms is reduced to an absolute minimum, such as by limiting offences to
acts intended to - and likely to - incite imminent violence. Then, perhaps, the uncertainty and
anxiety over Article 23 could finally be brought to an end.
LOAD-DATE: September 16, 2002
Clearwisdom Home
To Fellow Practitioners
on September 7
Yearly Archive
Printer Version