![]() | ||||
|
Third-Party Commentary: The Downfall of Hong Kong -- Art Exhibition Scrutinized By Wen Feng
(Clearwisdom.net) From August 23 to 26, Hong Kong held an art
exhibition of Australian-Chinese artist Zhang Cuiying's work. However, when the
artist arrived on August 22, she was barred from entering Hong Kong. Although
the authorities have not given any explanation, since Zhang Cuiying is a Falun
Gong practitioner, the reason is obvious. Unlike what other people may think,
Hong Kong's blacklist is being implemented on standby, instead of rejecting
Falun Gong practitioners' entry for security reasons such as when Jiang Zemin
visits Hong Kong. For this, Hong Kong has lost its illustrious name as an international free harbor.
Though this caused quite a commotion, this is just part of the whole picture.
Workers in the Leisure and Cultural Service Department, who originally didn't
know what was going on, were fearful of losing their jobs, so they repeatedly
scrutinized the contents and catalogue of the art exhibition, and sent out two
warnings. Even the Secretary for Home Affairs showed up to give warning.
Obviously they were all trying very hard to show that they were not involved
with Falun Gong and thus show fealty towards Beijing, for fear of being
condemned by Jiang Zemin and Tung Chee Hwa [the Governor of Hong Kong].
Chinese newspapers also came out with editorials to attack the art exhibition
and achieved the opposite effect, a kind very unusual "reverse
promotion," causing some people, originally uninterested in going to the
art exhibition, to show up. The organizers of the art exhibition ought to
publish a "thank-you statement" to express their gratitude for the
free promotion. [...]
Through this, it can be seen that both the Hong Kong Government officials and
the warning from Communist China's mouthpiece, are too childish and
simple-minded. They claimed that their examination of the art exhibition found
two things wrong: one, it featured Mr. Li Hongzhi's poems; two, it featured
Falun Gong content which was against Chinese traditions. This kind of criticism
is completely groundless. It is precisely traditional Chinese paintings that
usually have famous people's writings in poetry. Whoever criticized this poetry
in a Chinese painting is the one who has no idea what traditional Chinese
painting is. As for having Falun Gong content in the paintings, this is even
more of a tradition of both the East and the West. Not only do traditional
Chinese paintings have a lot of Buddhist and Taoist content, many famous
paintings of the West's Renaissance period have even more religious content. Not
to mention that Falun Gong is legal in Hong Kong which practices "one
country, two systems." So what is wrong with the art exhibition? According
to some sources, due to the disturbance caused by this kind of harassment, some
parties will demand compensation for their losses from the Hong Kong Government.
Posting date: 9/6/2002
feedback@clearwisdom.net |