My Understanding of "Fa-Rectification Cultivation"
By a practitioner in China
(Clearwisdom.net) Reading the experience sharing articles on Clearwisdom.net,
I have gained a different understanding of "Fa-rectification Cultivation." In
the past, I interpreted the "Fa-rectification cultivation" as "cultivation in Fa-rectification."
Now my personal understanding is that it is the "cultivation that goes along
with Master's Fa-rectification." In reality, to "cultivate in Fa-rectification" fundamentally does not depart
from "selfishness." It is still based on "selfishness" and "self," and is quite
far from the proper notion of "unselfish and selfless" or "always thinking of
others first." Speaking with a slight exaggeration, this is somewhat similar to
the thoughts of the old forces, that is, to utilize Fa-rectification and to get
from it what one wants. Master has said: "It might seem that you have done what
you should do for Dafa, when actually, you are doing it for your comprehensive
Consummation and return." ("Fa-rectification Period Dafa Disciples").This is the
fact that Master told us. As a disciple, if we take our own consummation and
return as the final goal in this unprecedented Fa-rectification period, we
probably have deviated from our noble pre-historical wishes of saving sentient
beings. As a matter of fact, Fa-rectification is bound to succeed. Even if no
one passes the test, Dafa can create new universes. It is Master's benevolence
that allows us this honor. Whether it is "cultivation in Fa-rectification" or "cultivation that goes
along with Master's Fa-rectification," the difference is where your starting
point is. Do I put "me" in the first place, or do I put Master's wishes first.
Either way is cultivating, but the implications are very different in these two
cases. This reminds me of those practitioners who failed to step forward. Even
from the individual cultivation point of view, we all know the principle of "The
cultivation is up to you, gong is up to the master." (Zhuan Falun) Master asked us to do three things well and to save the sentient beings. How
can we only care about our own cultivation at home? Perhaps one is concerned
about one's own safety. Does the issue of safety exist for the true life of a
practitioner who has obtained Fa and whose thoughts and conduct are both
righteous? Aren't those sentient beings that face the possibility of being
dropped out and their corresponding huge groups of lives in the cosmos the ones
truly jeopardized? Where is our benevolence if we do not try to save them? Shall
we not be responsible for the sentient beings, for Dafa, for the future of the
universe, and for ourselves? Above is my own understanding. Please correct me if I am mistaken.
Chinese version available at
http://www.minghui.org/mh/articles/2003/12/5/61809.html
Yearly Archive
Printer Version
feedback@clearwisdom.net
|
Related Articles
|