|
President of Ontario English Catholic Teachers Association Kathy McVean Writes to Prime Minister of Canada Regarding the Article 23 in Hong Kong
(Clearwisdom.net) 65 St. Clair Avenue East Phone 416-925-2493 March 12, 2003 The Right Honourable Jean Chrétien Ottawa ON K1A 0A6 Dear Prime Minister Chrétien: We the undersigned organizations and individuals across Canada strongly appeal
you to help stop the "National Security Legislative Provision Law" (otherwise known as
"Article 23 of the Hong Kong Basic Law") that is being pushed into legislation by the Hong
Kong/China government, and raise or co-sponsor a resolution to condemn China's abuses of human
rights at the upcoming UNCHR (United Nationals Commission on Human Rights) meeting beginning on
March 17th, 2003 in Geneva, Switzerland. We are extremely disappointed to see the Article 23 draft published on February
14, 2003. We found that the core of the Article 23 draft, the mechanism involving the banning of
organizations, is now more severe than it was in the consultation paper issued in the past. There has been a lot of new content added into the new draft. The most worrisome
part of this draft is that as long as the Central Government can issue a written document
declaring that an organization inside Mainland China has been banned for "national security
reasons", that piece of paper becomes enough "proof" for banning the subsidiary
organizations in Hong Kong and it cannot be challenged. So any organizations that
have branches in Mainland China and become outlawed in China will become a (banned) high-risk
organization in Hong Kong. This will subsequently implicate organizations such as Trade Unions,
Human Rights Groups, Hong Kong's Roman Catholic Church, and Falun Gong practitioners, etc. We are also astonished about the legislation involving "secret trials
(close-door hearing)" in the draft. As Ms. Audrey Eu, member of the Hong Kong Article 23
Concern Group, Legislative Council member, and senior lawyer pointed out that for a citizen's
appeal, the government's new item of closed-door hearings is extremely dangerous. "Even if you
appeal you could have a partial or complete closed-door hearing, which is a major issue for lawyers.
China also uses closed-door hearings on some dissidents. For example, Wang Bingzhang had half a day
of closed-door hearings and it was all over. The outside world has no clue what proof there was, and
what he had done to violate the law. The closed-door hearing is a very major and vital
offense." Canada is world renowned as a leader in respecting and upholding human rights and
its voice is significant. We sincerely hope that you will raise or co-sponsor a resolution
condemning the Chinese government's human rights record and help stop the enactment of this law,
which is in total violation of human rights. Thank you very much. The link to the Global Coalition Against Article 23 Legislation http://www.againstarticle23.org/cn/index.php Yours truly, Kathy McVean |