|
Break Through Everyday People's Notions: In Light of the Lawsuit Against Jiang Zemin, Clarify the Truth in a Timely Manner
By Overseas Dafa Practitioners
April 27, 2003
(Clearwisdom.net) The fact that a lawsuit has been filed against Jiang
Zemin in a United States District Court is by now a foregone conclusion. The
lawsuit against Jiang has become a breakthrough point to expose the evil
persecution in China and to clarify the truth. A group of Dafa practitioners
overseas have been busy around the clock to make sure that relevant information
for this case is being sent in a timely manner to various governments, the media
and the general public.
On the other hand, the way we eliminate the evil by filing a lawsuit against
Jiang is obviously different from that time in Texas when we gathered together
to eliminate the evil as one body. Looking at this situation and taking into
consideration the participation of overseas Dafa practitioners in this case in
the last few months, as a whole, we seemed to be rather slow and hesitant.
Without advice from others, we were at a loss, not knowing how to make use of
this lawsuit to clarify the truth. Yet, we do not have time to waste. Through Fa-study
and sharing, we realized that we were obstructed by an invisible notion, which
is "We do not know the law."
Let us look at some key points in this lawsuit from at the standpoint of
everyday people.
First of all, is Jiang guilty? According to moral principles of the law,
everyone is equal before the law. The victims have the right to sue the
offenders, and the guilty ones must be held accountable for the crimes they have
committed. If Jiang were not guilty, he would not fear to defend himself in
court. Jiang claims the lawsuit against him would harm Sino-America relations.
It follows then that the only reason for such a statement would be that Jiang
knows that he will lose the case. Such pressure from Jiang itself, threatening
that Sino-American relations would suffer, reflects his cowardly nature.
Second, the founding spirit of safeguarding human rights and world order
bestowed upon the U.S. and other free countries is as incompatible with Jiang's
dictatorship as fire and water. He abuses his dictatorial power to persecute
kind and innocent people. As for the U.S, the long-term benefits for the country
lies in her safeguarding the founding principles of their nation, safeguarding
their value of human rights and safeguarding their leading position to protect
human rights in the world. Should the U.S. give up these principles, she would
lose her true essence of being the U.S., an equivalent to losing her proper,
significant role and status on the world stage. In other words, it is due to her
valuing human rights and her leading position in upholding justice that the U.S.
is being what she is.
Safeguarding the founding principles of the U.S. and her values of human
rights coincides with the long-term interests of the Chinese people.
In addition, the Sino-American relationship is not a relationship between
Jiang and the U.S. The Chinese people are not Jiang's people, and China is not
Jiang's private property. Jiang can neither represent the Chinese people, nor
does he represent China, or the future of China. Hu Jintao is the current
president of China, and Jiang no longer enjoys immunity as a head of state.
Furthermore, the lawsuit against Jiang and his accomplices filed in the U.S
is not alone, as courts in Europe and Canada have already accepted similar
lawsuits. It is probable that more countries will follow their in their
footsteps.
From the perspective of Fa-rectification, why do Dafa practitioners who are
not working in the legal sector feel that they cannot clarify the truth around
this lawsuit? Is it because of the unfamiliar legal details?
It is obvious that there is a problem with our way of thinking. Master said
in "Lunyu,"
"In order to explore this domain, humankind must fundamentally change its
conventional thinking. Otherwise, the truth of the universe will forever
remain a mystery to humankind, and everyday people will forever crawl within
the boundary delimited by their own ignorance."
Dafa practitioners validate the Fa to save sentient beings, and we all do
this with our heart. In other words, we do this with our righteous thoughts
towards the Fa. We all know that there is no such differentiation and division
of work that those who study physics can only validate the Fa from the
perspective of physics, those who study biology can only expose the evil from
the angle of biology, and those specializing in literature can only clarify the
truth from a literary viewpoint. Before the arrival of the mighty current of Fa-rectification,
what Dafa practitioners are doing should surpass all areas of disciplines and
all boundaries of knowledge. We can do this because we are Dafa practitioners,
not because we are experts or scholars in a particular field among everyday
people.
To validate the Fa, we should rectify all incorrect thoughts and notions in
people's hearts towards Dafa, including incorrect thoughts in our own minds.
When we deviate from the principles of the Fa, we could be influenced by
everyday people's notions and would fall within the ignorance of everyday
people, and we would be unable to do anything we should do well in Fa-rectification.
If I have such a notion and others also have a similar thought, with many
thinking this way, a bad energy field would form. If we all deviate from the
requirements of Fa-rectification, we would not only obstruct ourselves, but also
obstruct many others from participation to clarify the truth around the lawsuit
against Jiang.
On April 14, the plaintiffs' attorney provided the court with documents of
crimes committed by defendant Jiang and by the "610 Office," as well as evidence
for the legal procedure for this lawsuit. After that, certain U.S. government
officials are going to prepare and submit to the court documents supporting
their viewpoints. The judge has set the deadline for submitting their supporting
documents on around May 8. Four to six weeks after that day, according to the
documents presented by plaintiff's attorney and the officials from the U.S.
government, the judge will make decision if the lawsuit will enter the judicial,
procedural phase, to try the defendant.
It is up to us whether we can cherish and make good use of this precious
period of time between now and May 8 and, based on this case, extensively and
thoroughly clarify the truth to all social levels in the world. What we do will
play a crucial role in guiding the next step in this case. Only Dafa
practitioners can validate Dafa during this period of time. If we passively wait
for or depend on everyday people to see the light by themselves, or wait for or
depend on a few legal experts, we would likely give the evil forces a loophole
to take advantage of, and we would leave a mark of historical regret. We
therefore hope more practitioners can make a timely jump to understand Fa
principles and use righteous thoughts and actions to treat this Fa-rectification
opportunity that history has placed before us.
As with the rescue of Charles Li, this case can only succeed when we are have
become broadminded to the greatest possible extent. Through the incident of
rescuing Charles Li, we extensively clarify the truth and save people. When we
make the truth known to people on a broader level, and people clearly see the
evil, the persecution of individual practitioners related to that broader level
certainly wouldn't continue to exist.
Not long ago, Dafa practitioners in Canada clarified the truth to the
governments and the media, based on the lawsuit against Jiang and at the same
time made use of the implication case of Ms. Wang Yuzhi's family members as
evidence of the persecution. These efforts brought good results. This is merely
one recent, successful example of clarifying the truth, from the standpoint of
both the overall situation and also regarding fundamental issues.
By contrast, if we forget the fundamental issues of clarifying the truth
while working with the media, with the government, through rescue efforts and
are involved in operations on the level of everyday people, and if we turn
around the particular details, we would then fall into the trap of the old
forces' arrangements. We would then place ourselves on the same level as
everyday people doing things. We would strive for a particular result in this
case, rather than for the fundamental issue of saving sentient beings. We would
then not be able to ascertain the key points for truth clarification, be afraid
that the people can't accept what we have to tell them, and other issues. We
would be entangled in some unavoidable technical problems often occurring in
everyday people's work.
We therefore understand that in the face of difficulties, we must keep
studying the Fa well, so that we can build up our righteous thoughts and do
things to the best of our abilities. Rules in everyday people society should not
be obstacles for us to clarify the truth. What we mean from "conforming to the
state of everyday people" is not that we use the state of everyday people to
hinder us in what we need to do, but that we make it easier for everyday people
and helps them best to understand the truth. If "conforming to the state of
everyday people" obstructs everyday people to understand us, it would mean that
we did not do well to offer salvation to people, and we need to emphatically
clarify the truth where obstacles have occurred.
Actually, our lawyers have done much work. They clearly explained Jiang's
criminal facts in the lawsuit documents and what the lawsuit is based on. The
documents have paved a smooth path for other Dafa practitioners to clarify the
truth. Through carefully reading the documents, we are absolutely capable to use
those facts to thoroughly clarify the truth of the persecution to different
circles in society.
Breaking through the notion of blindly admiring or blindly being scared of
the U.S. legal system is the basis for understanding and helping the flawless
process of the lawsuit against Jiang and the requirements for participating in
Fa-rectification cultivation.
This, however, does not mean to break through something of everyday people,
but to break through barriers in our own minds, and to get rid of our everyday
people's notions from our minds through cultivation.
|