|
Commentary: Article 23 Legislation is More Harmful Than SARS
(Clearwisdom.net) While Hong Kong is shrouded in the haze of SARS and the people of Hong Kong
struggle to stop its spread, the Hong Kong government has put their effort on Article 23 of the
Basic Law, the proposed legislation that threatens human rights and freedom. Most government
officials and the members of the legislation council are not willing to temporarily put aside the
deliberation of Article 23 legislation in order to fight SARS together with the Hong Kong citizens.
Ignoring their responsibilities in the crisis of SARS and its danger to the society, the economy and
government, they surprisingly held a public hearing last Saturday. A majority of the speakers from
different groups gave speeches strongly against the Article 23 legislation and questioned the motive
of the government, questioning the government whether it was intended to take advantage of the focus
of public and media attention on SARS in order to pass the legislation hastily and with less
resistance and fewer worried voices. Some speakers further stated if Article 23 legislation is
passed it would eventually destroy the human rights in Hong Kong, its rule of law and the policy of
"One Country, Two Systems," and that its future harm to people would be much worse than
SARS. Civil Human Rights Front (CHRF) formed by 43 nongovernmental organizations pointed out at the
public hearing that, under the appeal and worries from nearly 200,000 citizens who signed their
signatures and 60,000 citizens who demonstrated on the street against Article 23 legislation,
however, the government pays no attention to the will of the people and still pushes to forcefully
pass the legislation. CHRF questioned whether the government regarded the people as its enemy and
strongly denounced the government's act. CHRF further stated that it is known that the spreading of SARS has brought much damage to Hong
Kong. One significant lesson learned from the crisis is that if the freedom of information and media
has no legal system to insure it, people's right to know the truth would be weakened and the
consequence could be disastrous. Therefore, CHRF called for Hong Kong citizens to pay close
attention to the development of Article 23 legislation, because if it passed it would be more
harmful than SARS in the long run. Falun Gong practitioners of Hong Kong pointed out the intention of the central government who was
behind the Article 23 legislation and has manipulated the situation. The fundamental principle of
the Article 23 legislation is wrong. Article 23 is being forced to be added into the Basic Law by
the authority of the central government after the Tiananmen Massacre on June 4th, 1989 in Beijing.
It is not intended to protect the safety of the nation and the peace of the people but to
maintain the validity of the totalitarian central government. They said the mechanism in the bill to be able to outlaw local organizations that might be
connected to the outlawed organizations in the mainland in the name of state security have drawn the
most criticism and is in fact beyond the domain of Article 23. The mechanism will give a so-called
legal basis for the autocratic government of Mainland China to "legally" persecute any
groups in Hong Kong that it doesn't like. The autocratic government will play it like a remote
control to direct the government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and to try to
suppress any groups with different opinions. Falun Gong practitioners believed that if the Hong Kong people didn't strongly prevent the local
government from making such a vicious law as Article 23, the domineering style of the mainland
autocratic government would replace the style of ruling by law in Hong Kong. Therefore, the passage
of Article 23 legislation will become the beginning of the decline of human rights and ruling by law
in Hong Kong. Falun Gong practitioners also mentioned that the former Chinese President Jiang Zemin is being
sued overseas for genocide and crimes against humanity. Article 23 of Hong Kong is the extension of
the Jiang regime's crime of genocide and crimes against humanity. Falun Gong practitioners would
never wish that the government of the Special Administrative Region become an accomplice to this
heinous crime. The youth group of Hong Kong Alliance and the Hong Kong branch of Amnesty International gave the
following opinions. The Blue Bill seems to be for the safety of the region and the people,
but it includes ambiguous contents that leave many gaps for the government of the Special
Administrative Region to be able to manipulate it in maintaining its power and persecuting the human
rights, such as forcing the media to self-examine and using the law and police as politic tools. Hong Kong Voice of Freedom believed the freedom of speech and the publicity of truth are helpful
to maintain people's health. The current crisis of SARS is the combination of the natural and
man-made disasters. Because the local officials of Guangdong Province prevented people from knowing
the epidemic situation from the end of the last year till the beginning of this year, the local
people didn't know how to prevent it, thus causing the disease to spread to the whole country and
beyond to the whole world. The Voice of Freedom also said the Hong Kong government and the political puppets of the Beijing
government are forcing the passage of Article 23. It is not for the safety of the region but for the
safety of these authorities (merely the local officers), so that they can avoid being supervised and
criticized by the people. May 4, 2003 |