|
Time: A Case Study -- Shanghai has promised the WHO it will revise its diagnostic criteria for SARS. At issue: the real caseload By Hannah Beech/Shanghai
May 26, 2003 / Vol. 161 No. 20 Qilai Shen For Time Masquerade? Shanghai reports only 7 cases of SARS, but its impact is manifest
in masked pedestrians. Shanghai likes to play by its own rules. But the city's unilateralist
approach to severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) puzzles a senior hospital
administrator from Shanghai's Huangpu district. A month ago, visiting experts
from the World Health Organization (WHO) said Shanghai would relax its
superstringent standards for diagnosing suspected SARS patients to conform with
international norms. That should have caused the city's tiny caseload of
suspected SARS patients to increase substantially. But just a couple of days after the WHO's announcement, the hospital
administrator was curtly informed by local health-bureau officials that the
standards would not be changed. Then, last week, after the Ministry of Health
had further broadened the national standards, he was again called in for a
meeting with local health officials. "They said Shanghai was still being
allowed to stick to the old standards," recalls the doctor. "They said
Shanghai was an exception and that was agreed to by the Ministry of
Health." That means that before classifying a patient as a suspected SARS
case, the Shanghai Municipal Health Bureau requires that person to have either
traveled to a SARS-infected area or had known contact with a SARS patient-in
addition to the classic symptoms of high fever, cough, lowered white-blood-cell
count and suspicious spots on a chest X ray. The rest of China may be hewing to
new regulations that don't require verification of exposure, but Shanghai has
decided instead to protect its most important asset: its image. While other Chinese commercial centers from Guangzhou to Beijing have been
devastated by the pneumonia-like illness, China's financial capital has so far
reported only 11 suspected cases and seven confirmed ones-of the latter, two
have died and one is an American who was released from hospital late last week.
By contrast, in Beijing, where officials announced last week that people who
intentionally spread SARS could face the death penalty, there are more than
2,400 cases, of which more than 140 have died. Maintaining Shanghai's SARS-free
reputation has become an all-encompassing obsession for this proud city. After
all, an innate superiority complex makes it easy for many Shanghainese to
believe their city will somehow evade the virus. A massive publicity campaign on
SARS-prevention measures has helped, too, successfully quelling the large-scale
panic striking many other Chinese cities. Restaurants may not be packed as
usual, but life swings on in Shanghai. Yet as the weeks roll by and the promised adjustment to Shanghai's suspected
SARS caseload hasn't materialized, a restive undercurrent has many beginning to
wonder how a city of 16 million could be so lucky as to have just a handful of
SARS patients. Residents aver that they aren't worried yet; nevertheless, face
masks and vitamin C are in short supply. "I don't think anyone believes
there are hundreds of cases being hidden here, like in Beijing," says a
Shanghai respiratory-disease specialist who, along with other doctors in
Shanghai, has been forbidden by the local propaganda department to talk with the
foreign media about SARS. "But if Shanghai people lose trust in the way the
health bureau is classifying SARS cases, they may also lose trust in the whole
government. That would be a real crisis." The opaqueness of Shanghai's suspected SARS caseload could be the kind of
numbers game that dents that faith. The hospital administrator from Huangpu
district says he was told the WHO did not oppose Shanghai's decision to keep its
old diagnostic standard. But a WHO spokes-person in Beijing denies that is the
case. "If Shanghai's still using the old standards, they're contravening
national regulations," says the spokesperson. Indeed, the WHO has been
expecting Shanghai's suspected SARS caseload to increase, but instead it has
remained flat since April. Ostensibly, that's good news for a city obsessed with maintaining its bill of
good health. "My stocks are going up because Shanghai has escaped SARS,"
says Xie Lingzhen, as he scans the stock ticker at a local retail brokerage.
"Other places in the world have been affected, but our future will continue
brightly." To show just how serious Shanghai is about keeping the virus at
bay, the municipal government earlier this month mandated a limited quarantine
on anyone coming from a SARS-infected area-a policy that runs counter to Premier
Wen Jiabao's vow last month not to implement any extreme quarantine measures.
But Shanghai's quarantine policy has not been rigorously enforced, as dozens of
visitors from Beijing and Hong Kong continue to disperse into the city without a
trace. Still, locals seem to think that Shanghai can beat the bug.
"Shanghai is much cleaner than other places in China," says janitor
Shen Xianzheng. "Everyone knows that Beijing is very dirty and dusty, and
that's why so many people there got SARS." Life in Shanghai isn't all business as usual, however. More than half of the
city's industrial output derives from foreign investment, but international
businessmen haven't been showing up to sign new deals. Luxury hotels, usually
overbooked at this time of year, have just 30% occupancy; several top hotels
have been temporarily shuttered, including the venerable Peace Hotel, one of
Shanghai's historic landmarks. Many jittery expats have sent their families
home, while the much anticipated Women's World Cup soccer championship, for
which matches had been scheduled in Shanghai this fall, has been moved out of
China. And in a tacit admission that even the most careful of cities can't
always escape, Shanghai is building extra SARS wards on the outskirts of town,
in case there's a sudden overflow of patients. Nevertheless, local bureaucrats emphasize that SARS isn't a homegrown
problem, reiterating that all of Shanghai's SARS cases to date have been
"imported." All 11 suspected cases have an "epilink,"
meaning each person either visited a SARS-infected region or had contact with a
SARS patient, according to a doctor on the SARS-consultation board of Shanghai's
Center for Disease Control. But that's a tautology: because local doctors are
still following the old diagnostic standard, no one without an epilink can be
designated as a suspected SARS case, much less a confirmed one. And proving that
epilink can be very difficult. Two of Shanghai's confirmed SARS patients, for
instance, reportedly lied about having come from Beijing. Consequently, they
were kept for a few days in a normal fever emergency ward, where they were not
as stringently isolated as they might have been at the hospital designated for
suspected SARS patients. Says a frustrated Shanghai doctor: "If someone
lies about where they've been, there's no way you can screen every SARS patient
with 100% accuracy." In other cases, it's the government that has been shading the truth. By early
April, a businesswoman who traveled to afflicted Guangdong province had brought
the disease back to Shanghai and was admitted to the Contagious Disease
Hospital. For weeks, she was Shanghai's only confirmed SARS case. Yet, at the
same time, medical staff at the hospital said there were two other SARS patients
in the isolation ward-the woman's elderly father and a man from Guangdong
province. When asked why the other two were not part of the official statistics,
one hospital worker theorized that the father wasn't counted since he was an
ancillary case to his daughter and the Guangdong man didn't need to be tallied
because his symptoms weren't very serious. Two weeks later, the father was
finally counted as a SARS patient. He has since died. "You can hide
suspected patients," says the Shanghai respiratory-disease specialist,
"but it's hard to hide deaths." Shanghai has to hope this death will
be one of the few exceptions to its own rules. -With reporting by Bu Hua/Shanghai Posting date: 5/22/2003 |