Statement Regarding Hong Kong from United States Commission on International Religious Freedom
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE July 1, 2003 Hong Kong: Protect its Freedom WASHINGTON -- This week marks the sixth anniversary of Hong Kong's handover
to Chinese rule. Hong Kong and Chinese leaders who will celebrate this occasion in Hong Kong will be joined by tens of thousands of people who
are
concerned about the proposed legislation to implement Article 23 of the
constitution. The freedoms of the citizens of Hong Kong should not be
eroded by implementing new repressive legislation. "Hong Kong has been
the
beacon of freedom and prosperity in the Asia-Pacific region for many
decades. Let us keep the light on for future generations," said Commission
Chair Felice D. Gaer. The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) joins the
White House, the Congress, and many others in calling for the Hong Kong
government to halt the implementation of Article 23 of its constitution,
the Basic Law. The Commission commends the White House and the State
Department for their statements opposing the implementation of Article 23,
the U.S. House of Representatives for passing House Resolution 277, and
welcomes the introduction in the Senate of Joint Resolution 14, both of
which urge the governments of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
and the People's Republic of China to withdraw the proposed implementation
of Article 23. The Basic Law stipulates that the concept of "one country, two systems"
would apply to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for 50 years
after it became a Chinese territory in 1997. According to this concept,
Hong Kong would enjoy autonomy in legislative, executive, and judicial
matters vis-0-vis the government of the People's Republic of China. The
implementation of Article 23, however, would undermine that autonomy by
forcing Hong Kong laws to gradually conform to those on Mainland China,
where the legal system has permitted the casual and systematic misuse of
concerns regarding "national security" to suppress political dissent and
religious activities. The implementation of Article 23 not only
contravenes international understandings regarding the principle of "one
country, two systems," but also signals a regression in Hong Kong's overall
political development and respect for human rights. Article 23 of the Basic Law would threaten the human rights, including
religious freedom, of all residents of Hong Kong. It stipulates that the
Hong Kong government shall enact laws to prohibit "any act of treason,
secession, sedition, or subversion against" the Chinese government, the
"theft of state secrets," the operation of "foreign political
organizations" in Hong Kong, and the establishment of ties between Hong
Kong political organizations and foreign political organizations. To this
end, the Hong Kong government has introduced a national security bill,
which could be enacted by Hong Kong's Legislative Council on July 9. Particularly troublesome is the draft bill's provision that would allow the
Hong Kong government to bar or close down organizations that are banned
by
the Chinese government on national security grounds. This would have
serious negative implications for religious organizations like the Catholic
Church, other Christian communities, and others such as the Falun Gong,
that the government has labeled "evil cults." Falun Gong practitioners,
particularly those who reside outside China, have been accused by Chinese
national security agents of acting as foreign agents. Hong Kong officials have argued that many democratic societies around the
world also have anti-subversion laws similar to the one that was proposed
by the Hong Kong government. However, the Commission notes that in many of
those societies, there are effective legislative and judicial institutions
that protect the rights of their citizens as the laws are implemented. The
Commission further notes that a majority of the current Hong Kong
Legislative Council members were not elected by universal suffrage. The
implementation of Article 23 should not precede the establishment of a
legislature by the universal consent of the Hong Kong people.
Visit our Web site at www.uscirf.gov Felice D. Gaer, Chair 800 NORTH CAPITOL STREET, NW SUITE 790 WASHINGTON, DC 20002
Contact: Anne Johnson, Director
of Communications
(202) 523-3240, ext. 27
Dean Michael K. Young, Vice Chair
Preeta Bansal
Richard Land
Bishop William F. Murphy
Bishop Ricardo Ramirez
Leila Nadya Sadat
Nina Shea
Ambassador John V. Hanford III, Ex-Officio
Joseph R. Crapa, Executive Director
202-523-3240
202-523-5020 (FAX)
Yearly Archive
Printer Version
feedback@clearwisdom.net