Clearwisdom HomeNews & Media ReportsOpen ForumPractitioners' InsightsTruth Clarification
About Falun EmblemFalun Dafa WorldwidePersonal CultivationFa-Rectification StoriesScientific Findings
Welcome Note...
 
To Fellow Practitioners
on September 7
 
Article Selections
Cultivation Within Fa Rectification
Righteous Beliefs and Actions
Opposing Hong Kong's Enactment of Article 23
Rescue Charles Li
Prosecuting Jiang Zemin
Exposing the Crimes of Jiang Zemin
Exposing China's Cover-up of SARS
Sending Forth Righteous Thoughts
Audio: Sending Forth Righteous Thoughts Formulas
Staged Tragedy: Tiananmen Self-Immolation
Prophecies
Articles with Master's Comments
Announcements
 
Recognition & Support
Worldwide Support
Awards and Recognition
 
Photo Archive
Clearwisdom Photo Sitemap
Journey of Falun Dafa
Evidence of Persecution
 
The Persecution
760 Practitioners Killed in Persecution
SOS! Urgent Rescue
Latest News from China
Eye Witness Accounts
Solemn Declarations
Good is Rewarded, Evil Provokes Retribution
How to Help
 
Download Materials
Flyers & Handouts
Publications
Information Packages
Audio/Video
Links to Other Libraries
 
Important Links
FalunDafa.org
FalunInfo.net
PureInsight.org
ClearHarmony.net
PureAwakening.net
Falun Dafa Australia Information Centre
Rescue Our Families
SOS! Global RescueWalk
FGM TV
 
Third Party Supporters
Friends of Falun Gong
 
Contact Us
Editor
Web Team
Submissions Welcome
Daily Posting Subscription
Clearwisdom Fax
 
Search - Help
  
Advanced Search
 
Reference: Complaint of Lawsuit against Jiang Delivered Following Court Order (Photo)

(Clearwisdom.net August 2, 2003) On October 18, 2002, individual plaintiffs filed a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court of the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division against Jiang Zemin and Falun Gong Control Office (Office 6/10). The Civil Action No. is 02 C 7530. Based on Court Order on October 21, 2002, Defendant Jiang representing himself and the other defendant, Office 6/10, was served with the complaint and court summons by alternate service upon security agents designated by the courts as appropriate substitutes for personal service on October 22, 2002.

Based on Federal Tort Act (5, b, 2, item A), a lawsuit can proceed to the next step only if the complaint is served to the defendant.

On December 13, 2002, a notice of hearing in both Chinese and English was signed by a court clerk, a letter explaining the notice, complaint, summons, and copy of court order allowing the plaintiffs to serve the defendant by alternative service were delivered by FedEx to defendant Jiang's office in Zhongnanhai, the Central Government Office Compound in Beijing, China. The above-mentioned documents were received with signature by Mr. T. Huang at the mailing address of Zhongnanhai at 3:30 p.m. on December 18, 2002.

On January 13, 2003, the judge's oral order recorded in court notes asked plaintiffs to send absence ruling requisition (via FedEx not US postal office) to the defendants based on Federal Tort Act (5, b, 2, item A). On February 14, 2003, FedEx delivered two copies of the absence ruling requisition in English and Chinese translation to defendant Jiang's office in Zhongnanhai, Beijing. A FedEx agent delivered the documents in person and Mr. T. Huang from Zhongnanhai representing defendant Jiang received the documents and signed the receipt at 3:54 p.m. on February 14, 2003. Please see the delivery document, including written verification from FedEx Incorporation and receipt from FedEx.

Download related law documents and delivery verification (pdf files, 8 pages): 157 kb

Verification from FedEx showing successfully delivery of the parcel

Receipt from FedEx to Attorney Terri Marsh when she mailed the parcel

Posting date: 8/3/2003
Original article date: 8/2/2003
Category: Open Forum
Chinese version available at http://www.minghui.org/mh/articles/2003/8/2/54880.html

 Yearly Archive  Printer Version


We welcome your comments and suggestions, please email:
feedback@clearwisdom.net


Related Articles