Swiss Attache Follows Practitioners' Appeal Hearing in Hong Kong
(Clearwisdom.net) In Hong Kong, the appeal hearing for practitioners falsely charged with
obstructing the pavement while holding a peaceful appeal in front of the Chinese Liaison Office
began on the 3rd of September and lasted for three days. Three judges listened to the lawyers'
submissions. At the end of the hearing they could not give an immediate verdict. Through experience,
the lawyers said that it may take between several days and four weeks until the verdict is known. Many journalists were present in the court and followed the trial closely. The Attache from Switzerland, who followed last year's trial, also showed up
this time and expressed an interest in the case. She was not able to be present daily but asked
practitioners to keep her up to date on the hearing's progress, via a telephone call or email. The following is a press statement that was read by a Swiss practitioner before
the beginning of the hearing on the 3rd of September. Bringing Jiang Zemin to Justice in Europe Press Statement Hong Kong, the 3rd of September 2003 Ladies and gentleman, My name is Erich Bachmann. I'm from Switzerland and I practice Falun Gong. It is not easy for me to stand here and talk to you today. Why do I say this? I
was stopped by Immigration at the airport, and was only permitted to enter Hong Kong because today I
needed to attend our appeal hearing at the Court of Appeal. After the SARS crisis, which the Chinese Government failed to alert the world to
for about four months, was over, I read that China and Hong Kong wanted to work together to bring
tourists back. But obviously I am not considered one of those "desirable" tourists and I
am only allowed to stay here for nine days. The first time I entered Hong Kong I did not have any problems at Immigration.
This "special treatment" didn't begin until we were illegally arrested for carrying out a
hunger strike appeal in front of the Liaison Office, to call on Jiang Zemin to stop killing [Dafa
practitioners in China] on March 14th last year. Later, we had to stay in court for 26 days because
of false accusations. I think it would be hard to find a court case that took such a long time just
for so-called "obstruction of public property", a place where now, after more than one
year's work, huge flower beds have been installed. The other day, I passed by there and saw that the
flowerbeds cover more than two-thirds of the entire pavement. It makes me wonder whether those
flowers should be sued for causing obstruction in court. Would those police officers that arrested
us consider warning and removing the flowerbeds? It would be interesting to find out. Was our case really just an obstruction issue? What was the real reason that I
had difficulty entering into Hong Kong? It seems that Mainland China's suppression of Falun Gong has
been extended to Hong Kong, where people's basic human rights are supposedly protected. The fact is, on March 14th 2002, our right to demonstrate and our freedom of
expression was severely harmed, and on August 15th - the day when the guilty verdict was delivered -
Hong Kong's ability to protect people's rights was seriously doubted. It seems obvious that the Hong Kong Government has repeatedly given in to
pressure Mainland Chinese authorities, led by Jiang Zemin. After the persecution of Falun Gong began, practitioners around the world spoke
out against various fabricated lies and crimes committed by Jiang and his followers. In Hong Kong,
Falun Gong has been viewed as a litmus test of the "One Country Two Systems" by other
countries, as well as many of Hong Kong's own residents. A lot of people have realized that Hong
Kong Falun Gong could very well be the first target if Article 23 legislation is passed. Article 23
not only harms people's right to practice Falun Gong, but also if it is implemented, the
much-cherished human rights and freedom of Hong Kong will be cut back, and people's lifestyle will
be forever changed. This is contrary to what leaders who look to the future should do. The Hong Kong government should not let Jiang and his followers, who place their
personal interest and feelings above the law, ruin the future of Hong Kong. The rest of the world
knows that Mainland China has constantly violated human rights. To protect human rights in many
countries the "Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide" was
ratified. Jiang Zemin has committed crimes of Genocide in his mad persecution of Falun Gong
practitioners. To enforce his policy of "defaming their reputation, bankrupting them
financially and destroying them physically" he has forced people to act against their own will.
Under his orders many people have committed atrocious crimes that will weigh heavy on their
conscience for the rest of their lives. After four years of brutal persecution, finally Jiang Zemin is facing lawsuits in
Europe: Belgium í On August 20th 2003, a criminal lawsuit charging the former Chinese
Communist leader Jiang Zemin and two of his senior aides with the crime of genocide, crimes against
humanity and state-directed torture, was submitted to the federal prosecutors by practitioners of
Falun Gong and their lawyer, Mr. Georges-Henri Beauthier. Two of Jiang's most senior accomplices,
Luo Gan and Li Lanqing (the head of the "610 Office") have been named in the lawsuit. Mr.
Beauthier brought the first successful case under Belgium's human rights law against two individuals
for their roles in the Rwandan genocide of 1994. France í In July this year, a criminal court in Paris began legal proceedings
with a lawsuit, charging the former Vice-Premier of China, Li Lanqing, with crimes of torture. Mr.
William Bourdon, one of the lawyers responsible for trials against Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet,
has taken on this case. An examining magistrate in Paris has been assigned. The complaint is based
on the United Nations Convention against Torture. As a signatory, French Courts are authorized to
hear cases that allege violation of its terms. Switzerlandí This year in March, Mister Philip Grant, president of the Swiss
based international NGO "Track Impunity Always" and legal counsel representing Falun Gong
practitioners, announced plans to sue Jiang Zemin for torture, genocide, and other crimes against
humanity. Jiang will face formal legal litigation if he enters Switzerland. Our Hong Kong case will be part of these lawsuits, which are soon to follow in
various European countries to stop Jiang Zemin killing people who only want to practice Qigong
exercises and be good people in society. Jiang Zemin, on the other hand, has used the state-run
media to demonize Falun Gong and incite hatred towards practitioners. By means of all these lawsuits Jiang Zemin's days are numbered and very soon he
will be found guilty for his crimes; justice will prevail. Even with these actions, we are not against China but it would be good if the
ruling Chinese Government takes steps to stop Jiang Zemin and this cruel persecution. Jiang Zemin is
ruining China; he harms China and brings disaster all over this wonderful land. We have to stop
this, we have to work together to stop this evil tyrant who is out of control. An example of how other countries respect human rights can be found on the Swiss
Government's website at: http://www.eda.admin.ch/eda/e/home/foreign/huright/humri.html Human rights are rights which people are inherently entitled to. Every man, woman and child can
lay claim to these because they are human beings. Human rights means recognizing human dignity and
the freedom of every individual to make their own decisions. They are essential qualities of human
existence. They enable human beings to live according to their nature. Human rights thus limit the
power of ruling individuals. The ruler or the state is not free to act as it pleases. Citizens can
cite human rights to defend themselves against the state and to demand justice. These rights include the right not to be tortured, freedom of speech, freedom to
practise the religion of one's choice, freedom of assembly, as well as respect for one's personal
property. Human beings may not be discriminated against because they belong to a minority, are of a
different race, or if they are female. Human rights, however, also entail the right to receive certain services from the
state such as schooling for children, adequate nutrition and a pension for the elderly. They protect
the values of the community, and also apply to individual relationships. With these words I want to end this speech, thank you very much for your
attention. Erich Bachmann Source: http://clearharmony.net/articles/200309/15179.html
Yearly Archive
Printer Version
feedback@clearwisdom.net
