|
Identify Our Priorities, Harmonize Our Thoughts
(Clearwisdom.net) For a period of time, practitioners in some areas in
China had different opinions in choosing what content to use for
truth-clarifying material and disks. One opinion was that truth-clarifying
material written by Dafa practitioners must be pure and cannot be mixed up with
things might cause people to think that we are involved in politics, and that
Dafa websites should not post any non-practitioners' articles and reference
materials in the everyday people's style. Another opinion was that it is easier
to help people understand and see Jiang's nature by revealing his acts of
treason and political corruption, and the Party's history of making up lies and
framing innocent people ruthlessly. Therefore, they collected these kinds of
articles published here and there on the websites, putting them together as the
most important material to be copied and distributed. I think that both ways of
thinking have some merit, but also go to the extreme. In doing anything, we should not go to the extreme, or else we would produce
negative results. While cultivating during the Fa-rectification period, what can truly save
people are Dafa disciples' Fa-validation and the pure truth that we bring to the
people. These are the essential things. We must be clear on this point, so that
we can keep our actions pure and walk our paths righteously. However, during recent years, many people have been poisoned by Jiang's
propaganda and lies. In addition, they have attached too much importance to
their own notions. To them, pure substance of truth and positive Dafa material
are like highly nutritious but heavy food, while they are like weak, diseased
patients, unable to absorb and digest the food. If we don't consider their
ability to absorb and keep giving them big meals of heavy food, it might make
them give up eating for fear of choking, or they may fail to absorb the
nutrition they need for their recovery. Therefore, to truly help them and give
them the chance to survive in the future, we must give them different types of
food, which fits different situations and different needs. This raises the question of our judgment. It's not to say that we cannot pick
topics that everyday people like. Sometimes it's necessary to add some things
that are not so highly nutritious, but still helpful for their recovery. To
those who have already basically recovered, if we keep giving them light food or
a liquid diet, their recovery will be delayed. On the other hand, whether we lay bare the evil's extensive lies and expose
its history of making people suffer by using lies and framing people with their
political movements, or we put in some traditional cultural elements, we are
taking steps to help people understand the core message and the purest, most
important substance of our truth-clarifying material. If we consider things
written by non-practitioners or topics of broad public interest easily accepted
by them as more important, or even if we consider material written by Dafa
practitioners to be not acceptable by everyday people, then we are putting the
incidental before the fundamental. Then, we would be underestimating many
ordinary people who have great predestined relationship with Dafa and good
enlightenment quality. In the situation where the evil has been cleared up and
is becoming less and less, the clearheaded side of a person is playing more and
more of a leading role. Therefore, many people are looking for, and ready to
hear, the facts about Falun Gong. Teacher said, "On important matters, practitioners must pay attention to the
attitude of Minghui Net." (See
http://www.clearwisdom.net/emh/articles/2000/6/15/8785.html) Some
practitioners only see a part of the situation, paying no attention to the whole
and overall situation, or they look too deeply into words and lines of certain
articles to find this "attitude." Indeed, if we carefully look at them, it's
easy to see that the aforementioned reference material on Minghui net is only a
small part of the whole and is entirely for our reference and assistance. They
function like vitamin supplements. What can truly save patients is the medicine
itself. This, I think, might be the main direction offered by Minghui net on
this issue. Of course, there is another issue that is extremely important. That is, the
purity of truth-clarifying material may be reflected in many aspects, such as
writing articles, filmmaking, why and how materials are edited, the choice of
materials, the key points, the train of thought one offers the readers, and so
on. Since truth-clarifying materials are used by practitioners to save
non-practitioners, they should not be written for practitioners. Then, where the
expression of language is concerned, we should choose words that can help
people, even those poisoned by lies, so that they can better understand and
accept the material. The job of making materials written by practitioners suitable for a
non-practitioner audience is very important, directly affecting the
effectiveness of the material. It takes special care and much labor to gain
skill from practice. Especially in western societies, we can see that people pay
a lot of attention to gaining experience and developing and improving their
professional skills. At the beginning, one may start from zero. After writing
articles for a long time, if one still doesn't know who his readers are, or what
is required for different styles of articles and their basic features (such as
news report, experience sharing articles, comments on current issues, novels,
poems), the effect of his truth-clarifying material may be far removed from what
he had originally hoped for. In practitioners' truth clarification, the result
depends on if a practitioner takes the issue seriously and how seriously he
takes it. Therefore, after one becomes clear on the fundamental issues and able
to tell the primary from the secondary issues, it is also natural and necessary
to emphasize the ways and methods to carry them out. Truth-clarifying materials in different forms and with different "weight"
would be used to save different readers. These materials can complement each
other but hardly replace each other, so we need to make good use of all of them.
To this point, we practitioners should keep ourselves reasonable, objective and
sober-minded. We should put saving people first and foremost, and not have our
decisions influenced by our attachment of doing things, personal interests and
stubbornness. If all of us can do this, there would be no conflicts, as none of
us would have selfish mentalities, and we would be able to see at once the
advantage of other people's proposals and adjust our own accordingly. Therefore,
our truth-clarifying work would be smooth and harmonious. |