Epoch Times: Vague Reporting by Xinhua News Exposes Obvious Missing Facts: The Wei Xingyan Case
By Zhang Tianliang
Mar 02, 2004 The Xinhua website recently posted a vague news item claiming that, after an
open trial, the First Intermediary Court of Chongqing sentenced five defendants
to prison terms ranging from five to 14 years. Purportedly, their crime was that
lying about the treatment of a Chongqing University graduate student who was
raped and murdered in the Shapingba District Detention Center for practicing
Falun Gong. They posted the story on a Falun Gong website called Clearwisdom.net. It is curious that the reporter, Huang Huo, said nothing about the trial
itself, and presented none of the arguments that led the judge to believe that
the five defendants, Chen Shuming, Yuan Qiuyan, Li Jian, Ying Yan, Lu Zhengqi,
lied about a person named, "Wei" and her family. Also, why was the
victim's full name omitted? Does the reporter fear that readers will investigate
and then doubt the veracity of the report? Since the beginning of the Chinese government's crackdown on Falun Gong,
Xinhua's reporting on issues concerning Falun Gong has become more and more
unbelievable. From the vagueness of the article, one can only surmise that there
was indeed an incident that took place that involved a Falun Gong practitioner
named Wei and that news of this incident did actually find its way through the
information blockades set up by the government. It then seems that the
authorities resorted to the court system to impose heavy sentences on those
involved to cover up the terrible truth. Out of curiosity, I did a Google search using "Chongqing
University," "Shapingba," and "Falun Gong" as keywords.
Strangely enough, the first article I found was entitled "Investigation
Report on the Vicious Rape and Persecution of Wei Xingyan, a 28-Year-Old
Graduate Student, by the Chinese Police (IR 2003-06-06)." This report was
much more detailed and altogether more credible than the Xinhua version. It
reported that, Wei Xingyan, a third-year graduate student studying towards a
Master's degree in high voltage power transmission, was arrested on May 11,
2003. She was suspected of launching balloons, to which were attached Falun Gong
banners, in honor of the May 13 World Falun Dafa Day, ont the Chongching
University campus. She was sent to the Shapingba District "610 Office"
for interrogation. Later, she was sent to the Baihelin Detention Center. During
this investigation, trying to conceal their apparent complicity, Chongqing
University officials lied and denied that Wei had ever attended their school. On the evening of May 13, the police in the detention center ordered two
female inmates to strip off all of Wei's clothes. She cried out, "You have
no right to treat me this way!" Then a uniformed policeman entered, pushed
Wei to the ground and raped her in front of the two other inmates. Wei Xingyan
sternly warned the policeman, "I have noted your police badge number. You
won't get away with this." After the assault, Wei began a hunger strike in
protest. The police then conducted force-feedings, injuring her trachea and
esophagus, leaving her unable to speak. On May 22, Wei Xingyan, already on the
verge of death, was sent to the Southwestern Hospital in Chongqing City. Many
plainclothed "610 Office" agents guarded and monitored her day and
night so they could question, follow and arrest anyone who tried to visit her. Clearly, the latter version of events conveys more credibility than that
carried by Xinhua, although a reasonable person would probably be shocked by
news that a police officer would rape someone in broad daylight. In fact, the
low regard for the sanctity of life exhibited by Chinese law enforcement
officials can also be seen in the highly publicized case of Sun Zhigang (Sun
Zhigang was seized by police who thought he was homeless and beaten to death
while in custody.) A Chinese intellectual, Ren Bumeim, wrote a letter to
President Hu Jintao urging him to launch an independent third-party
investigation of the Wei Xingyan case. The "open trial" conducted by
the Chongqing court would supposedly have nothing to do with state secrets and,
presumably, documents or even video recordings could thus be posted onto the
Internet to show how Chinese courts conduct their business based on "truth
and law." Chinese courts frequently suppress evidence by jailing witnesses, especially
in cases concerning Falun Gong. In July 2001, with the assistance of human
rights lawyers, Falun Gong practitioner Peng Liang, sued Hubei Deputy Police
Chief Zhao Zhifei in New York, after his mother, Li Yingxiu and brother, Peng
Min were killed by the Hubei "610 Office." Zhao immediately arrested
Peng Liang after he returned home. After the faked Tiananmen Square "self-immolation incident," Falun
Gong practitioners pointed out over a dozen suspicious inconsistencies that
indicated Jiang Zemin was content to sacrifice innocent people in order to frame
Falun Gong. One of the victims, Liu Siying died shortly after the incident. The
Chongqing trial is a continuation of the practice of removing witnesses to cover
up the truth. On the other hand, the Xinhua website report could pique the interest of
Chinese Internet users and raise the concern of the international community
about the state of law enforcement in China. The World Organization to
Investigate the Persecution of Falun Gong is likely to archive the Xinhua
article and deal with the whole issue in good time. The Chongqing judge and the
reporter "Huang Huo" will eventually face justice. Source: http://english.epochtimes.com/news/4-3-2/20209.html
Yearly Archive
Printer Version
feedback@clearwisdom.net
