|
Oral Arguments in Lawsuit against China Press and Singtao Daily Conclude--Dafa Practitioners Thoroughly Clarify the Truth to New York Legal Community (Photos)
(Clearwisdom.net) Clearwisdom.net Tang Feng reports from New York -- On the
morning of July 16, 2004, oral arguments in the defamation/civil rights case
against the China Press and Singtao Daily were heard in New York's Second
Circuit Court of Appeals (address: 40 Foley Square, Manhattan). The lawsuit was
filed by a group of Falun Gong practitioners in the metro New York area. Three
judges, including Hr. Rosemary S. Pooler, Hr. Robert D. Sack and Hr. Reena Raggi
heard the oral arguments. The hearing began at around 10:40 am and lasted about
50 minutes. Plaintiffs appealed to retain their rights of prosecution and for a
revision of their complaints. The court will make the decision within six weeks. Artist's sketch of courtroom The two attorneys, Sam Israel and Lana S. Han, immediately following the
oral argument inside the courthouse.
First, plaintiffs' attorneys Mr. Sam Israel and Ms. Lana Han respectively
stated the nature of this case from related articles of the law and the two
newspapers' libel against Falun Gong: Over the past few years, the China Press
and Singtao Daily have closely cooperated with the Chinese government to
demonize Falun Gong overseas through media, which has directly harmed Falun Gong
practitioners in the New York metro area. These acts included the hatred
instigated in the New York Chinese community against local Falun Gong
practitioners. As a consequence, Falun Gong practitioners have been
discriminated against and even attacked in the Chinese community. Falun Gong
practitioners' normal activities such as rallies and parades were interfered
with and local police departments and other government officials had to mediate
the situation.
Attorney Mr. N. Park who heard the oral argument in the court said that
Attorney Sam Israel's statement and response to the judges' questions were solid
and justifiable and his mind was clear and agile. Attorney Lana Han was very
calm in responding to Judge Sack's rapid fire questions. She composedly
explained to the judges the nature of this case; that is, the Chinese newspapers
collaborated with the Chinese government in the suppression of Falun Gong. They
helped export the slanderous lies overseas which directly harmed Falun Gong
practitioners in the New York metro area.
Attorney Lana Han expressed to reporters that the Chinese media outlets
abused the freedom of press in the United States to instigate hatred in the
Chinese community against the belief in "Truthfulness-Compassion-Tolerance". The
newspapers made their choice to become major tools for the persecution of Falun
Gong practitioners in the New York area. This surpasses the range of press
freedom and therefore should not be protected by the first amendment of the U.S.
Constitution.
On the day of the oral argument, Falun Gong practitioners came early to the
court where no seats were vacant, and in addition, several dozen seats were
temperately added.
Practitioner Levi, who attended the hearing, said that the field of righteous
thoughts was very strong. Instead of appearing aggressive, the judges
attentively listened to our attorneys' statements. Although Judge Sack was
persistent in his questions, under attorney Han's calm response, he attentively
listened to Ms. Han's statement.
Over the previous two days, practitioners held appeals and an anti-torture
exhibition in Foley Square near the courthouse and City Hall.
At the end of June, Falun Gong practitioners held an anti-torture exhibition
in Foley Square opposing the courthouse. In the two days prior to the oral
arguments, practitioners once again held the anti-torture exhibition. At noon,
streams of people came and went. Through watching the live re-enactment of the
torture methods used against Falun Gong practitioners, passersby obtained a
direct knowledge about the five-year persecution of Falun Gong practitioners in
China. One after another, people signed the petition, took the information
packets and asked practitioners for more information.
In an experiences sharing, practitioners realized the importance of
systematically clarifying the truth to the legal community. So many people work
in legal circles, and they need to be made aware of the truth. This case
provided a good opportunity. With practitioners' effort, law professors and
federal judges got the opportunity to be exposed to the truth-clarifying
information.
After the oral arguments, some practitioners explained to attorney Floyd
Abrams, who represented the defendant China Press, that the China Press is not
an independent newspaper, but is a mouthpiece of the Jiang regime. Practitioners
expressed their regret towards Mr. Abrams for his defense of the evildoers and
that he would not feel good later on when looking back. Attorney Abrams
expressed that he was aware of the Falun Gong practitioners' plight. He also
honestly admitted in the court that the persecution of Falun Gong practitioners
is worthy of sympathy.
Some practitioners from New York and New Jersey voluntarily formed a legal
team to be in charge of this case's development, updating others as well as
sharing understandings with others in a timely manner. The legal team came to
realize that in the process of Fa rectification, Teacher has cleared away
tremendous amount of evil factors. Practitioners have become more and more
mature and they have cooperated with each other more and more smoothly.
Practitioners have a collective improvement in understanding the Fa. The power
of righteous thoughts and righteous actions as an integrated entity made the
oral arguments successful. The case itself shocked the evil a great deal. Over
the past more than one year, the China Press has not published slanderous
articles.
Practitioners utilized this case to broadly clarify the truth to the New York
legal community. Together with other truth-clarifying activities, this has
greatly helped the New York legal system to learn about how the Jiang group
manipulated overseas Chinese media outlets to export the persecution to other
countries. This further deepened their understanding of the persecution of Falun
Gong in China.
Practitioners from the legal team expressed that they will continue to
cooperate with other truth-clarifying work to clarify the truth to the legal
community and bring the beauty of Falun Dafa to all people who have the
predestined relationship. Posting date: 7/19/2004 |