|
Why Jiang Zemin Created the "610 Office"
By Clearwisdom.net reporter Ouyang Fei
(Clearwisdom.net) For years the Chinese government has been trying to scale
down its huge bureaucratic system and to improve its judicial system, so people
expected that the government would resort to legal channels rather than any mass
movement to resolve any further conflicts in their country. However, on the
issue of cracking down on Falun Gong, Jiang Zemin has set up a special
organization called the "610 Office," which has branches in the local
and central government. The question is: why would he want to add an extra
organization in a government that is already burdened with so many bureaucratic
departments already? The "610 Office" formally started to function on
June 10, 1999, at Jiang's request. During a political bureau meeting, a decision
was made to set up a "special leading team to deal with the Falun Gong
issue." According to the conventions of Chinese authorities, the
organization was named after the date it was established. From the central
committee of the ruling party to its local committees at different levels, it
has branches in their political and law sectors. Sometimes it is directly under
the control of the ruling party committee office. To avoid suspicion of the
party's interference in governmental administration, the state department then
set up "the office for preventing and solving evil cult issues." It
was combined with Jiang's original "610 Office" to be one organization
collaborating with the administrative array of the ruling party. To
non-governmental parties they are just called the "610 Office."
Is the "610 Office" necessary? By 1999 China's legal system had been complete and competent
enough to deal with basic social "conflicts" like the Falun Gong event
in which 10,000 practitioners peacefully appealed at the central government
building on April 25, 1999. No matter how Jiang claimed that Falun Gong had led
to many people's deaths, the validity of his accusations should be judged by
law, with the plaintiffs, defendants, the lawyers of both sides publicly
debating in court and having the court make the judgment. This is the proper
procedure under a judicial system. If Jiang really wanted to rule by law and set up an
organization to deal with the Falun Gong issue, this organization's duty should
be to resolve any illegal matters pertaining to Falun Gong according to the laws
of the country. That is what a rational government should do based on the
following reasons: It would indicate the Chinese government's great
improvement in the openness of administration and the progress toward
"governing by law" any issues involving a large group in society
through a legal channel instead of a mass movement. It is the victims' legal right to sue Falun Gong if such
people ever really existed. However, Jiang merely wanted to use these
"victims" as a tool to attack Falun Gong. As a result, these
"victims" indeed have their basic human rights harmed by Jiang. An open, legal procedure would safeguard millions of Falun
Gong practitioners' rights and demonstrate to the world China's human rights
protection. As for all of Jiang's charges against Falun Gong, a court
should determine whether the so-called victim really behaved according to the
teachings of Falun Gong; whether the victim's death was actually caused by Falun
Gong; whether a mentally disabled person's act has any direct connection with
Falun Gong and whether the Falun Gong's principle "Truthfulness, Compassion
and Forbearance" has any connection with Jiang's charges. Only through an open and impartial court debate and
presenting the evidence and facts by representatives of both sides, can people
be convinced of the charges. However, Jiang' regime didn't seek any legal channel. What his "610
Office" did was to put aside the present legal system of the country and
spend a large portion of its revenue to build up its own system to eliminate
Falun Gong. What does it mean? It means the following: As it has been seen by all, Jiang's major reason to eliminate Falun Gong
[1] is that Falun Gong's theory is "ridiculous." But this excuse
itself can hardly be the reason to persecute Falun Gong or any other group. To
the atheists, as is the communist party, any religious theory is ridiculous.
In the realm of science, the scholars of different schools of learning might
deem others' theories "ridiculous." Jiang's logic is that whatever
he doesn't favor must be banned. Obviously this logic is ridiculous and far
from the law. All the homicide cases involving Falun Gong reported by the state-run media
never went through substantial legal procedures, but were used to attack Falun
Gong through the media. From the "self immolation on Tiananmen
Square" incident to "Fu Yibin's bloody homicide case" in
Beijing, from "Dong Li's homicide case" in Chaoyang, to
"Throwing poison by Chen Fuzhao" in Wenzhou, the scenes people
remember is not a trial by judges but the exaggerated performances of the
China Central TV reporters, whose jobs are to produce anti-Falun Gong
programs. Facing the wide spread suspicion from overseas, Jiang dares not invite
Falun Gong or any other third party to investigate these cases, and did his
best to blockade the news about these suspicions instead. Moreover, any
individual or any activity that spreads the truth about Falun Gong will be
instantly given a guilty verdict and sentencing under Jiang's orders. The Chinese court, under Jiang's control, seldom accepted
Falun Gong practitioners' lawsuits against people who were involved in
persecuting them. Even if they occasionally accept such cases, they would add
huge pressure on the lawyers representing Falun Gong practitioners, and all
these cases ended without result. In contrast, if the Falun Gong practitioners
who clarify the truth of Falun Gong are arrested and sent to court, they will
announce piles of charges and never allow any plea of not guilty, and then
sentence the practitioners severely. Some Falun Gong practitioners were even
beaten in court for pleading innocent. Many practitioners have been illegally
detained over extended periods, tortured and forced to confess to having
committed a crime before they were secretly tried in court. The maintenance of the persecution of Falun Gong in China
relies on this "610 Office" overriding the whole judicial system. The
function of "the special leading team to deal with the Falun Gong
issue," which oversees the "610 Office", is similar to that of
"the central leading team of cultural revolution" during the Cultural
Revolution. Both of the dictators made use of such a strategy to bypass the
normal judicial procedures and to forcibly implement their policies that violate
the will of the majority and harm the interests of the country. The building-up of the country's judicial system will be only
an empty concept as long as Jiang's persecution continues and the "610
Office" is not outlawed. No matter how perfect the judicial system is, the
leaders of the country will follow Jiang's pattern to set up their "leading
teams" and their corresponding "offices" from the central to
local government in order to do whatever they want. Under such circumstances,
even the best judicial system, which has subordinated to something like the
"610 Office," will lose its function and become a tool to persecute
the innocent. In summary, the "610 Office" [2] is persecuting not
only Falun Gong practitioners but also the entire population of Chinese
citizens. Notes: [1] During the initial phase of the suppression, Jiang
claimed he was going "to eliminate Falun Gong in three months." [2] Due to the endeavors of Falun Gong practitioners to
expose the facts of the persecution to the world, Jiang's clique changed the
"610 Office" to "evil cult problem solving office." But the
function of the organization never changed. The experts of legal circles widely
hold that no matter how the title of this organization changed, its judgments on
their concerned targets and the corresponding means are without the fundamental
legal basis and, most of all, severely violate the constitution of the country.
Observers also noticed that a lot of practices of the organization, such as
transmission of instructions from superior offices or personnel, who arrest and
detain people, were evaded from the public. They even dare not leave any written
evidence.
|