|
The April 25th Appeal Cannot Be Construed as Grounds for Persecution
By Li Zhiqing
(Clearwisdom.net)
On April 25, 1999, about ten thousand Falun Gong practitioners
went to the Appeals Office of the State Council in Beijing,
requesting the authorities to grant them a free and legitimate
environment for their practice, which became the well-known "April
25th Mass Appeal". As the petitioning crowds were later led by the
police to the vicinity of Zhongnanhai, the office and residential
compound for China's top leaders, some also have called it the
"April 25th Zhongnanhai Incident." Many people believed that the
persecution of Falun Gong would not have happened were it not for the
April 25th Appeal. But actually that view does not hold.
First, the
suppression of Falun Gong started several years prior to the April
25th Appeal. In July 1996, China News Press, a government news
publisher, took administrative measures to confiscate Falun Gong
books and ordered that no publishers would be allowed to publish
books introducing Falun Gong. While numerous state-run newspapers and
journals carried articles slandering Falun Gong, not a single article
defending Falun Gong was allowed to be published. In July 1998,
China's Ministry of Public Security decided in an internal document
to ban Falun Gong. In other words, the suppression of Falun Gong had
long been premeditated and was not ignited by the April 25th Appeal.
Secondly, the
Chinese communist regime has never needed legitimate grounds to
uponattack and persecute any civil group. The regime did not have any
legitimate reasons when it suppressed landlords, businessmen, and
intellectuals. Excuses such as "[landlords] took lands,
[businessmen] were bursting with wealth, and [intellectuals] had too
free a mind" were all absurdities concocted when they did not have
any legitimate reasons. The April 25th Appeal was also used by the
regime to justify its persecution. Even if the April 25th appeal had
not occurred, the communist regime in China could have created other
grounds for persecution all the same. The fact is, before the April
25th Appeal, the Chinese communist regime had anticipated that Falun
Gong practitioners would resort to petitions after practitioners in
Tianjin City were beaten and illegally arrested by police, an
incident incited by the authorities. The regime could have stopped
Falun Gong practitioners from going to the Appeals Office in Beijing
if it had wanted to. Instead the Jiang clique employed the trick of
"abetting practitioners" and the Tianjin police even explicitly
told practitioners to go to Beijing to "resolve their grievances."
So, in a sense, the April 25th incident was masterminded
single-handedly by the Chinese communist regime itself.
Thirdly, in any
case, the April 25th petition can never be the grounds for
persecution. In China, appealing to higher authorities is a
legitimate right laid down in law. Falun Gong practitioners went to
appeal on April 25, 1999 only after they had been defamed and
wronged, so their petition was completely sensible, legitimate, and
reasonable. Having a large number of people is not a legitimate
reason for persecution. In 2001, more than 20 thousand people from
about ten organizations and groups were protesting near the White
House when President Bush's inauguration was being held. On
September 24, 2005, tens of thousands of protesters were holding
demonstrations against the war in Iraq in Washington, D.C. Besides,
in the April 25th Appeal, the peaceful and rational Falun Gong
practitioners had been quiet and orderly, and did not disrupt the
public order or people's daily life. They dispersed quietly when
they received a reply to their requests. In any truly democratic
country, such a peaceful and cooperative demeanor would have been
appreciated instead of persecuted.
It is true that many
Chinese have no way of speaking up for themselves and upholding their
rights when their rights are abused. But that is no reason for
chiding Falun Gong practitioners for speaking the truth and upholding
their legitimate rights on April 25, 1999. It is even less reasonable
to approve of the Chinese communist regime for its using the incident
as grounds for persecution. If one does not stand up when his right
to believe in the principles of Truthfulness-Compassion-Forbearance
and the right to become a good person are deprived, is he still worth
living as a human being? Is there any hope for such a state? And is
there any future for such a nation?
During decades of
rule by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), fear has been sown deep in
the people's minds. Deeply poisoned by the CCP's party culture,
many people are afraid of being persecuted and ostensibly show their
trust in the CCP. Some people blindly believe that the CCP is
definitely correct and whatever the CCP says is true. Others are
willing to always be in line with the CCP and follow it in fighting
anything that is against the CCP, regardless of whether it is right
or wrong. With such a mindset brainwashed by the party culture, many
Chinese have lost their own judgment and have become slaves to the
CCP and prisoners of the party culture.
From this
perspective, the April 25th Appeal not only showed Falun Gong
practitioners' peaceful and rational demeanor, but more
importantly, it shed light on how people can free themselves from the
prison of the party culture, find their true selves and recover their
right to be a human being. This is something one should be clear
about at a time when people are reflecting more and more upon the
CCP's history and China is moving toward a peaceful transition.
|