![]() | ||||
|
In Attempt to Deport Elderly Chinese National, Singapore Suddenly Drops Charge Against Her (Photos)
(Clearwisdom.net) Three Singapore Falun Gong practitioners (Chinese
National Chen Pei Yu, and two Singaporeans Ng Chye Huay and Erh Boon Tion) were
charged by the police for conducting a peaceful protest outside the Chinese
Embassy on July 20, and the trial was set to start on August 28. On August 17,
however, the Subordinate Courts suddenly dropped the charge against Ms. Chen Pei
Yu, and the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority wanted to deport her back to
China. Ms. Chen is 73 years old and has been living with her daughter in
Singapore for more than 2 years. Ms. Chen Pei Yu, first from the left in the front row Ms. Chen protesting the persecution outside the Chinese
Embassy in Singapore Time Line August 10 -- On her way to shop for groceries, Ms. Chen was
taken away by officials from the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority. She was
told that her green card was suspended and she has to leave Singapore by August
17. Ms. Chen told the officials that she was awaiting trial and couldn't leave.
However, the officials pay no attention to her. In his letter to Ms. Chen, Mr. Eric Tan, Director of the Immigration and
Checkpoints Authority, wrote: "Chen is "unwelcome" in Singapore
because her participation in a protest outside the Chinese Embassy violated the
'Assembly without Permit' and 'Public Recreation' regulations." August 12 -- Ms. Chen hired human rights attorney Mr. Ravi to handle this
urgent issue. Mr. Ravi immediately wrote to the Immigration and Checkpoints
Authority. He pointed out that the decision violated related laws and he
requested an extension so that Ms. Chen could attend the trial. Mr. Ravi emphasized that Ms. Chen is not only one of the three defendants but
is also a material witness for the other two defendants Ng and Erh, and her
absence will harm their case. As Mr. Ravi is now representing Ms. Chen on this issue, the three defendants
decided to hire him to represent them in their lawsuit as well. August 16 -- At 11:00 p.m., Ms. Chen Pei Yu suddenly received an urgent
notice from the police authority, notifying her that the court will open at 4:00
p.m. on August 17 to process her case. August 17 -- Ms. Chen was originally ordered to leave Singapore by 4:00
p.m. [conflicting with the court schedule]. The court announced that the charge
against Ms. Chen was dropped. However, it refused to give an explanation. Around midnight, Ms. Chen received 23 copies of the "Notification of
Dropping Charge" urgently delivered by the police authority. Sixteen of the
23 were signed by Tanglin Police Divisional HQ and seven were signed by Central
Police Divisional HQ. Every copy stated that the police had decided to terminate
investigation of her case and to issue a severe warning instead to her after
deliberate consideration and consulting the prosecutor. Ms. Chen often distributed Falun Gong truth-clarifying materials
at the Chinese Embassy, Chinese Kwan Imm Temple, and Merlion Park. These
locations are under the jurisdiction of the Tanglin Police Divisional HQ and
Central Police Divisional HQ, and police officials have been monitoring
practitioners' activities. Recently, they often took photos or videotaped
practitioners and then "established a case" to investigate. Each of
the 23 reports corresponds to one truth-clarifying activity. The Immigration and Checkpoints Authority extended Ms. Chen's stay to August
21. August 18 -- Attorney Ravi filed an application to the Subordinate Courts
to request to have Ms. Chen as a witness in the lawsuit against the three
practitioners, and the application was approved. Based on this court decision,
Ms. Chen will then apply for an extension to the Immigration and Checkpoints
Authority. On the same day, the Singapore Falun Dafa Association held a press
conference, and Ms. Chen told reporters: "I don't want to accept this
dropping of charges without explanation. If the authority thinks that the charge
was wrong, it should drop the charge against all three of us. Otherwise, it
should give me the opportunity to defend myself. This action by the Singapore
authority is very strange. What on earth are they worrying about?" Posting date: 8/21/2006
feedback@clearwisdom.net |