![]() | ||||
|
FDI: China Genocide Suit on U.S. Supreme Court Steps Victims of Atrocities Urge Court to Uphold "Inalienable Rights" for All After
dousing Liu's body with ice-cold water to intensify the electric currents,
several labor camp guards shocked his body with electric nightsticks -- each of
which emits a 36,000-volt charge -- targeting sensitive parts of the body such
as the mouth, neck, anus and genitalia.
In
the hallway just outside, other victims lay moaning or vomiting from similar
torture.
On
the other side of the camp, 60-year-old Ms. Fu Shuying, 27-year-old Ms. Chen Hui
and 30-year-old Ms. Sun Yan are tied up in a spread-eagle position as torturers
repeatedly thrust long rods into their vaginas causing severe inflammations and
bleeding. Other women suffer similar tortures with toilet and shoe brushes.
This
is the Dalian Labor Camp in China, one of hundreds where Chinese police and
guards are under orders from the Communist Party's highest authorities to use "any
means necessary" to coerce practitioners of the traditional Chinese meditation,
Falun Gong, to renounce their faith, and swear allegiance to the Party line.
For
Mr. Liu, Ms. Fu and countless others, should they survive their "re-education,"
there will be no justice under China's judicial system. In fact, for many of the
100 million people in China who practice Falun Gong, China's judicial system is
one of several state organs used to carry out a 5-year-old persecution that many
human rights lawyers are calling genocide.
Halfway
around the world, however, hope -- or at least hope's beginnings -- can be found
on the front steps of the United States Supreme Court where the fate of a
class-action lawsuit against China's former leader Jiang Zemin now rests.
A
Landmark Case
In
October of 2002, practitioners of Falun Gong filed a class action lawsuit
against former Communist Party Chief, Jiang Zemin, the man who "mobilized a
Mao-era mass movement against [Falun Gong...]" according to CNN's Senior China
Analyst, Willy Lam.
The
District Court for the Northern District of Illinois dismissed the case based on
a suggestion of immunity filed by the United States' Department of State. This
suggestion, however, was based upon their characterization of the former Party
chief as the legitimate leader of the People's Republic of China, despite the
fact that his Mao-era tactics rival those of the Nazis in the Second World War,
the Bosnians in Bosnia-Herzegovina, and the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia. The Seventh
Circuit subsequently affirmed the District Court's decision -- notwithstanding
the fact that the defendant stepped down from Communist Party and government
posts shortly after the case was filed.
Yet,
the policy upon which the Department of State based their opposition to this
lawsuit is fast fading from the American stage. Tyranny -- as indicated recently
in Mark Palmer's "The Real Axis of Evil" is a breeding ground for the kind of
terrorism we experienced on September 11, 2001, and a recipe for disaster if
left unchecked.
In
his book, Palmer -- a former U.S. Ambassador and 26-year veteran of the U.S.
State Department -- puts forth a blueprint foreign policy manual on how to rid
the world of the last remaining dictators: A collection of 45 leaders Mr. Palmer
calls "the world's 45 least wanted."
The
Wall Street Journal called Mr. Palmer's book, "One of the best but least noticed
books among all the tomes addressing the quest for peace in the post-Sept. 11
era."
For
his "eradication" policy against Falun Gong and implementing other human rights
atrocities, Palmer places China's Jiang Zemin among the worst of them.
Attorney
for the plaintiffs, Dr. Terri Marsh, agrees. "The defendant will go down in
history as one of the most unscrupulous men of the twentieth century, a man who
tortured and murdered thousands upon thousands of adherents of Falun Gong, a
spiritual practice based on the moral and spiritual principles of truthfulness,
compassion and forbearance," Dr. Marsh says. Apart from the fact that Jiang was
never legitimately elected to office, as is required in China by the
Constitution, Dr. Marsh argues that such "least wanted" as Jiang Zemin, Saddam
Hussein, Adolph Hitler and the Khmer Rouge are per se not legitimate heads of
state due to the magnitude of their crimes against humanity.
International
human rights lawyers agree, and have, one-by-one, set off a worldwide
chain-reaction of lawsuits against Jiang -- in countries such as Belgium, Spain,
France, Ireland, Canada, Iceland, Switzerland, South Africa, Greece, Korea and
Taiwan.
According
to Theresa Chu, the lawyer responsible for the filing of many of these cases
against Jiang Zemin, together they comprise the "biggest international human
rights case since WWII."
On
February 7, 2005, the U.S. case against Jiang was submitted to the Supreme
Court.
According
to Dr. Marsh, it is in the vital interests of the United States to bring the
defendant to justice. "A dismissal of this case," she says, "undermines the
entire framework of Nuremberg and the principles upon which our nation was
founded. Moreover, the Seventh Circuit's opinion stands alone among the circuits
in holding that a (legitimate or illegitimate) former leader's crimes of
genocide and torture can be considered protected and immune."
An
American Testament
Even
in the infancy of the United States as a nation, the country's role in the
protection of a rule of law and human rights abroad was well understood. In
1775, Alexander Hamilton wrote, "The sacred rights of mankind...are written by
the hand of divinity itself, and can never be erased or obscured by mortal
power." According to the Massachusetts's resolution of October of 1765, "there
are certain essential rights...which are founded in the law of God and nature,
and are the common rights of mankind." Thus, in the Declaration of Independence,
the founding fathers state that all persons are "endowed by their Creator with
certain inalienable rights." These rights include the right to govern oneself
and to follow one's spiritual faith and practice freely.
As
Senators Lieberman, McCain and Congressmen Wolf, and Lantos indicated in their
recently introduced pro-democracy bill, the United States' foreign policy must
be based on the support of these rights and of a rule of law everywhere.
According to Senator Lieberman, "over the past thirty years... legitimate
political authority based on the consent of the governed has taken its rightful
place. But still tyranny thrives in too many places in the world."
The
Right to Claim Protection of the Law
Chief
Justice Marshal stated in 1803 (in Marbury v. Madison) when human rights had
already received the attention of our courts: "the very essence of civil liberty
consists in the right of every individual to claim protection of the law when he
receives an injury." Again, in another case before the Supreme Court, The
Schooner Amistad, counsel made the argument that persons held as slaves on board
a vessel that was later taken to our shores must be set free or the U.S.
executive and judicial branches would become complicitors in the deprivation of
fundamental human rights. In response, the United States Supreme Court ordered
that the former captives be set free, noting that the issue must be decided upon
eternal principles of justice and international law.
In
1980 the Executive Branch made clear that the Alien Tort Claim Act, enacted into
law in 1789, permits aliens to sue in U.S. Courts for torture and other crimes
against humanity. In 1992, the Torture Victim Protection Act was enacted into
law by the United States Congress to protect victims of torture around the
globe. According to President Bush, who signed the bill into law, in spite of
his administration's concern of potential interference with U.S. foreign policy,
"this legislation is important because it maintains and strengthens our
commitment to ensuring that human rights are everywhere respected."
For
Mr. Liu, Ms. Fu and others lying naked and bleeding on the Dalian Labor Camp
floor, that the U.S. remain firmly committed to the cause of liberty around the
world could mean the difference between life and death. Indeed, millions
throughout China are hopeful that the Court's deliberations about this case will
be grounded in the founding principles of our nation. Thomas Jefferson knew that
the Republic he helped create would lead the world by example. What better
example could there be than to faithfully protect the rights of the world's
people to be free from the shackles of tyranny and torture?
###
FEATURE
- Apr. 01, 2005 Falun
Gong, also known as Falun Dafa (about),
is a practice of meditation and exercises with teachings based on the universal
principle of "Truthfulness-Compassion-Tolerance." Practiced in over 50
countries world-wide, Falun Gong has roots in traditional Chinese culture.
With government estimates of as many as 100
million practicing Falun Gong, China's Communist leader Jiang Zemin outlawed
the peaceful practice in July 1999 (report).
Since that time, Jiang's regime has intensified its propaganda campaign to turn
public opinion against the practice while imprisoning, torturing and even
murdering those who practice it. The Falun Dafa Information Center has verified
details of 1,583 deaths (reports
/ sources)
since the persecution of Falun Gong in China began in 1999. In October 2001,
however, Government officials inside China reported that the actual death toll
was well over 1,600. Expert sources now estimate that figure to be much higher. Hundreds
of thousands have been detained, with more than 100,000
being sentenced to forced labor camps, typically without trial. FOR MORE INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE FALUN DAFA
INFORMATION CENTER Posting date: 4/3/2005
feedback@clearwisdom.net
|