The Age: Clash of worlds
June 11, 2005 As its economy liberalizes,
China is winding back the clock on political rights. Defecting Chinese diplomat Chen
Yonglin has no reason to be afraid of punishment if he returns to China,
according to the country's envoy in Canberra. "There are laws which would
guarantee his freedom," ambassador Fu Ying said this week. China indeed
has many laws and constitutional provisions protecting the rights and freedoms
of its citizens. Unfortunately, this legal protection prevails only haphazardly
or not at all when those rights and freedoms come into collision with the power
of the Chinese Communist Party. Fu would find this out if, like
millions of other middle-aged Chinese, she became a follower of Falun Gong. The
movement has been banned in China since a protest it staged in 1999. Fu would not get the benefit of
a trial, or legal aid, but be sent off, through an arbitrary police process, to
one of some 280 "Liaojiao", or "re-education through labor"
camps. Falun Gong says about 100,000 of its followers have been sent to these
camps, of whom 1076 have died from torture and abuse. (1) If she were still a [steadfast] Falun
Gong [practitioner], Fu would then be liable to be picked up by the local
police 610 Office - named after the June 10, 1999, decision to
crack down on the movement - and put through weeks of harsh thought-reform at
special institutions given the Orwellian title of "law schools". The fate of the two would-be
defectors, diplomat Chen and even more so the alleged 610 Office police officer
Hao Fengjun, will be influenced by the continuing offensive against Falun Gong,
with which both will now be seen as associated. While they say they are not
Falun Gong followers, both say their decision to break with the Chinese
Government came because of personal revulsion at suppressive tasks they were
ordered to carry out against Falun Gong. Hao has also declared that he is
resigning his Communist Party membership, which supports a Falun Gong media
campaign claiming that a million people have recently resigned from the party
in a tacit protest. (2) What the ambassador says is quite immaterial . . . it
shows they are quite keen to get this guy back." "It's quite a coup for
Falun Gong," says Dr Nicolas Becquelin, research director in Hong Kong for
the respected New York-based group Human Rights in China. "It demonstrates
that they still have a few sympathizers among officials." Chen would certainly face
retribution if Canberra sent him back to China, as an example to its other
diplomats, Becquelin says. "Possibly he would be sentenced under state
security charges for slandering the party leaders and the country - they have
some provisions they can apply to this case. I think what the ambassador says
is quite immaterial. If one thing, it shows they are quite keen to get this guy
back," he says. Meanwhile, the defection cases
have exposed the darker side of a huge country undergoing massive social and
economic upheaval - but still locked in a Leninist one-party dictatorship. A growing proportion of China's
1.3 billion people are empowered by economic prosperity, higher education and
new freedom to choose their employment, place of residence, and marriage
partners. Yet, in terms of political
rights, China is not just standing still, it is winding back the clock.
Communist Party General Secretary Hu Jintao is putting all the 69 million party
members through intensive re-indoctrination in Marxist theory and the thoughts
of China's successive communist leaders. A pyramid of "political and
legal" committees operates from national to local level, headed at the top
by politburo standing committee member Luo Gan, 70, who was trained in modern
police methods by East Germany's Stasi secret police. These committees tell
police who to target, and judges who to convict and what sentence to pass. The party's propaganda arm - it
likes to call itself the "Publicity Department" these days - controls
the media and about 30,000 police monitor the internet, while websites and
weblogs have to register or face huge fines of up to 1 million yuan
($A158,000). For all the acclaim given to
scam-busting media ventures such as the magazine Caijing, it remains evident
that it is mostly the approved targets for official scapegoating that get
pilloried. In most cases, victims and complainants never escape suppression by
local power cliques involving party, police, judges and businessmen. Parties in
court cases have a single stage of appeal, meaning they rarely get accepted
above the provincial level and beyond the power of local oligarchies. Petitioning is a right
guaranteed in the constitution, yet local police regularly block aggrieved
people from taking their case to the combined state-party petitions office in
Beijing, located in a rundown back alley in which desperate people camp for
months, even years, for a hearing. When a prestigious political event is
looming, Beijing police herd petitioners into a football stadium, then call in
provincial police to bus them home. A new law on petitions that took effect
last month tries to delegate handling of complaints back to the local level,
and limits the time complainants can spend outside offices in Beijing. Briefing the visiting
International Olympic Committee last month on preparations for the 2008 Games
in Beijing, party chief Liu Qi said the Games would reflect a "harmonious
society", code-name for the dissentless orthodoxy that Hu Jintao is making
the hallmark of his leadership. We can expect Chinese protesters to be swept
out of sight. A police handbook on "Olympic Security English"
suggests visitors will be told to stick strictly to watching the Games. Still, China may be evolving
faster than the controls. Its netizens include some of the world's most cunning
hackers. The DVD free-for-all means that most people can watch any movie they
like and banned books are sold in cheap pirated copies. Illegal satellite
dishes pull down blocked foreign channels. Attendance at official and
underground churches is put at about 45 million, and is growing at a rate that
will soon outstrip the Communist Party's efforts to enlist more recruits. Australian officials are now
preparing for their annual human rights dialogue with Chinese counterparts. As
usual, it will be a closed-door event and the Australian Parliament and public
will be given no more than a bland assurance that all the right buttons are
being pushed in the most effective way. The evidence brought by the
defectors Chen and Hao would be highly relevant to discussion of at least one
area of grievous human rights abuse in China, the control of religious
expression. But so far, it seems, no one in
Australian foreign affairs, justice or intelligence circles is keen to look at
it.
Yearly Archive
Printer Version
feedback@clearwisdom.net