About "Sujiatun" Evidence

By a Falun Dafa Practitioner in the United States

Falun Dafa practitioners have unanimously come to understand the secret Sujiatun Concentration Camp--based on evidence revealed by witnesses, data collected and the CCP's evil history, it is all true. We, Falun Dafa practitioners, are the victims of this persecution, so we should be the ones revealing the facts and calling for urgent rescue of practitioners. The CCP must provide evidence to prove their denial.

We have often heard a question when clarifying the truth about Sujiatun Concentration Camp to Congress, media, VIPs, and organizations: "Where's the evidence?" These people who seek evidence may be thinking that such crimes are inconceivable, or use lack of evidence as an excuse to refuse to help, or maybe we did not clarify the truth clearly enough to them...

All we are doing currently is to stop this evil persecution, rescue our fellow practitioners, and save the people of the world. If we clarify the truth inefficiently, causing people not to understand, not to believe, or not to support us, then we failed to reach our goal of saving people.

Although as victims, we do not have the responsibility or legal convenience to obtain evidence of the CCP's crimes, so in order to clarify the truth and save fellow practitioners from being slaughtered, we must face questions of evidence raised by ordinary people, and we must clarify this with rationality. Currently not every Falun Dafa practitioner has learned enough about the Sujiatun incident. Attached are materials we compiled for fellow practitioners to use as reference. Please add missing parts, and let us keep revising and updating it.

* * * * * * * * *

Table of Contents

I. What Is Evidence?

II. Evidence

1. Three Witnesses' Statements Revealing Live Organ Removal and Body Cremation in Sujiatun Concentration Camp

2. Existence of Large Pools of Live Donor Sources

A. Large Amount of Organ Transplant Operations with Short Waiting Periods and More Than Enough Sources

B. Organ Donors Are "Death Row" Prisoners?

C. Organ Pool from Live Donors

3. Most Live Donors Are Falun Dafa Practitioners

A. Organ Supplies Increased Drastically after 1999

B. Chinese Definition of Death Row Prisoners

C. Where Are Those Missing Falun Dafa Practitioners?

4. CCP Denies Existence of Camp; Journalists Invited to Investigate

A. Late Response

B. CCP Officials Lied

C. Lies about Investigation

D. Large Underground World in Shenyang City

5. Other Evidence - The CCP's 610 Office Recently Issued Urgent Notice

III. Exactly What Evidence Do You Need?

1. Live Evidence?

2. Reverse Burden of Proof Is in the Law

IV. If You Don't Want Others to Know, You Shouldn't Do It in the First Place

V. Answers to Inquires

1. Only Certain Level Hospitals Can Do Kidney Transplant Operations

2. Never Heard of Sujiatun Concentration Camp

VI. The Trial of Conscience

I. What Is Evidence?

There are seven kinds of evidence: (1) Objects and Statements; (2) Witnesses' Statements; (3) Victim's Statements; (4) Suspects' or Accused Person's Defense, Statements; (5) Checking Conclusions; (6) Investigation and Testimonial Records; (7) Audio-Visual Materials

II. Evidence

As victims, Falun Dafa practitioners have collected evidence that belongs to categories (1), (2), (4), and (7).

1. Three Witnesses' Statements Revealed Live Organ Removal and Body Cremation in the Sujiatun Concentration Camp

Three witnesses have stepped forward to provide their statements, which revealed the existence of the Sujiatun underground Concentration Camp, and the bloody crimes committed inside. Three witnesses proved evidence from three different angles, but the same facts - Falun Dafa practitioners' organs are being harvested live, and their bodies cremated in Sujiatun Concentration Camp; many practitioners have been murdered this way.

2. Existence of Large Pools of Live Donor Sources

A. Large Amount of Organ Transplant Operations with Short Waiting Periods and More Than Enough Sources

Korea Daily exposed in 2005, the so-called "biggest organ transplant center in the world," referring to the Transplant Surgery Department of Tianjin City First Central Hospital. The hospital undertook 507 liver transplant operations in 2004, and more than 53% of these patients were foreigners. Voice of Germany reported on October 25, 2005 that nearly 2,600 liver transplant and 6,000 kidney transplant operations have been performed in China in 2004.

There are around ten hospitals in Shenyang City capable of organ transplant operations, reporting that 250 kidney transplants and more than 70 liver transplants have been performed according to reports in 2005. The Shenyang Military District Kidney Transplant Center's Urological Surgery Department of the District General Hospital reported, up to January 2006, more than 1,500 kidney transplants have been performed in the Center. Another Military Hospital - PRA 463 Hospital (Air Force Hospital) declared that they performed the most kidney transplants among all the hospitals in Liaoning Province. The Organ Transplant Institute under the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University declared that they performed more than 600 kidney transplants and 120 liver transplants in 2005. Based on the unique conditions of organ transplant, only when there is a large live donor pool, can so many organ transplants can be performed.

Recently some individual investigators called the Shenyang Military District Kidney Transplant Center, PRA 463 Hospital (Air Force Hospital), and Beijing City Chaoyang Hospital, along with other hospitals, and the doctors said their kidney donors are all live prisoners and this is an open secret throughout Mainland China hospitals. When being asked if the death row prisoners' organs were still in good condition, they said it is absolutely guaranteed that all are healthy young donors' kidneys, the operation success rate is higher than 90%, and patients would be quickly operated on with the organ transplant in no longer than one week.

Shockingly, located in Shenyang City, Liaoning Province, CITNAC (China International Transplantation Network Assistance Center) advertised on their website that for a kidney transplant you normally need to wait one week and at the most one month to find a suitable donor, and that a liver transplant needs two months at the most to find a suitable donor. This Center is formed by the Organ Transplant Institute under the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University (also called the Shenyang City Multi-Organ Transplant Center). Its website has Chinese, English, Japanese, Korean, and Russian versions (the Chinese version has recently been removed).

CITNAC's Chinese Website posted transplant charges:

Kidney transplant: US $62,000

Liver transplant: US $98,000-130,000

Heart transplant: US $130,000-160,000

The Chinese patient would normally be charged:

Kidney transplant: 50-80 thousand yuan

Liver or heart transplant: 200-400 thousand yuan

Therefore, the hospital can have the profit of ten to a hundred thousand dollars more for each foreign patient compared to a Chinese patient. These prices do not include the purchasing of expensive gifts for the surgeons and other staff, etc.

B. Organ Donors Are "Death Row" Prisoners?

If the donor organs indeed come from prisoners on death row, then their organs can only be used in hospitals near the execution grounds.

According to statistics published by Amnesty International, about 2,000 prisoners are executed in China each year, and sometimes the highest estimation can reach 10,000 each year. How many people were sentenced to death and were executed in the Shenyang area each year? Are all of them willing to donate their organs? The hospitals in the Shenyang area have always claimed that the organs they use for transplant belonged to young people. Are all death row inmates young? Would the execution always coincide with the short time frame within which the transplants must be carried out on the patients (plus the donor and recipient's type must match)?

Medically speaking, the match rate between direct relatives is about 50% for live kidney transplant, and the incomplete match rate between a recipient and an unrelated donor is between 1% and 2% for kidney transplant. Based on this knowledge, and applying this number to Shenyang City alone, even all of the local prisoners' organs that are usable through the tissue matching would not suffice the number of transplants carried out each year in Shenyang City. Wu Gang, an associate professor at the Organ Transplant Division of No. 1 Hospital Affiliated with China Medical University said, "Right now, the source of kidneys in Shenyang City is absolutely guaranteed!"

Obviously, prisoners' organs are not enough to fulfill the high demand of organ transplants. According to the China International Transplantation Network Assistance Center (CITNAC) website, a second organ would be provided within a week if problems arise with the first organ, so it is also impossible that the second organ comes from a death row prisoner.

The reason is Chinese courts usually announce a list of names of death sentences at a time, and it is very rare for two groups of prisoners to be executed within one week. Therefore prisoners are not a reliable source of emergency donor organs. Take into consideration that emergency donor organs also exist the issue of tissue matching; the live organ supply at the Shenyang City Multi-Organ Transplant Center is in fact even larger than our estimates above. We can thus only deduce one horrifying conclusion: a huge source of live organs that is independent of the one from executed prisoners exists in Shenyang City and especially at transplantation centers like CITNAC.

C. Organ Pool from Live Donors

Due to kidney shortages, even in the US where organ donation is an accepted practice, and in New England with many top medical institutions, the average wait time for kidney transplant is between three to seven years. According to information provided by patient groups who went to China to receive kidney transplants and the investigation of the World Organization to Investigate the Persecution of Falun Gong (WOIPFG), the wait time including tissue type match is less than two months. CITNAC also promises that a matching liver, a single organ for a human being, can be found in one month and two months at the longest. The time to find a matching kidney is usually one week and does not exceed one month. An emergency kidney would be provided if the problem arises with the first kidney during surgery, and the second kidney would be provided within one week, guaranteed.

Due to the difficulty in tissue type matching with the emergency kidney, it is almost impossible for the second organ to come from another prisoner or an accident victim, therefore the emergency kidney could only be taken from a spare organ pool. Because kidneys must be transplanted within 24 hours (48 hours in the US), this organ pool has to be living people. Again, if considering that there needs to be a tissue type match, it also illustrates that there is at least one living organ pool with a quite huge cardinal number in the Shenyang area whose only function is to have their organs removed as needed at anytime.

3. Most Live Donors Are Falun Dafa Practitioners

A. Organ Supplies Increased Drastically after 1999

According to China's official statistics, only 78 liver transplants were carried out in the eight years between 1991 and 1998.

After the persecution against Falun Gong began in 1999, the number of liver transplants grew drastically. In 1999, 2000 and 2001, the cases of liver transplants were 118, 254 and 486, respectively. In 2001, this number shot up to 996, which tripled in 2003, reaching more than 3,000 cases. This growth shows donor organs increased nationwide after 1999. We use liver transplants as an example because the liver is a single organ without which the donor cannot survive.

July 20, 1999 was the day when the CCP and Jiang's regime started carrying out the comprehensive genocide policy against Falun Gong. This persecution has lasted nearly seven years.

B. Chinese Definition of Death Row Prisoners

After Jiang Zemin started persecuting Falun Gong, he applied the policy of "ruin their reputation, bankrupt them financially, and annihilate them physically." According to his own words, all Falun Gong practitioners who persist in their belief in Truth-Compassion-Forbearance are death row prisoners in the eyes of Jiang Zemin. In 2000, Jiang ordered: "Beating to death is nothing and shall be counted as suicide; do not identify the person and cremate the body directly" in handling Falun Gong practitioners. Although not a single Falun Gong practitioner has been sentenced to death in court, according to an incomplete estimate on the Clearwisdom website made with information collected through civil channels, as of today 2,852 torture death cases have been confirmed, and some of the Falun Gong practitioners who were tortured to death had their organs harvested while they were still alive.

In the eyes of the CCP, Falun Gong practitioners are "class enemies," and physical annihilation is the way to handle "class enemies," which is the definition of "death row prisoner" in China. The following are a few cases published on the Clearwisdom website about Falun Gong practitioners who had their organs harvested:

On February 16, 2001, Falun Gong practitioner Mr. Ren Pengwu, 33 years old, from Harbin City, was arrested for distributing flyers that clarify the truth about the self-immolation on Tiananmen Square. He was held at No. 2 Detention Center in Hulan County. He died five days later, early in the morning on February 21, 2001. Without consent from Ren Pengwu's family, the police claimed to conduct an autopsy, but in fact they harvested all of Ren Pengwu's organs from his throat to his groin, before cremating his body.

Ms. Hao Runjuan from Guangzhou City died after being tortured for 22 days at Baiyun Detention Center in Guangzhou City. Her body was dissected without her family knowing or consenting to it.

Twenty-nine-year-old Mr. Sun Ruijian from Ningde City, Fujian Province was detained by Beijing police in November 2000 when he went to Beijing to appeal. On December 1, his family was told that Sun Ruijian had jumped out of a car during police escort and died. His family asked to see his body, but the police made up excuses and shunned their request. When Sun Ruijian's wife finally saw his body, the chest and abdomen were cut open, with the eyeballs bulging out.

A man who was once held at Baiyun District's Drug Rehabilitation Center in Guangzhou City saw several drug addicts beating a Falun Gong practitioner. A doctor witnessed the beating and said, "Do not hit him in the lower abdomen. The kidneys are useful." He heard the doctors tell the drug addicts several times that they should not hit Falun Gong practitioners' abdomens or eyes.

The cases above represent only a fraction of such death cases. If even publicly detained Falun Gong practitioners can have their organs removed, what about practitioners held in secret? They have become a source of most live organs. The conversation between investigators at the WOIPFG and some Chinese hospital staff validate the point:

Case 1: (A hospital affiliated with a medical university in Hunan Province)

Doctor: We choose only young and healthy kidneys. We never accept kidneys from elderly people.

Investigator: Do you have kidneys from Falun Gong practitioners?

Doctor: You can be assured of it!

Case 2: (A hospital in Shandong Province)

Investigator: The completely healthy kidneys from people who practice Falun Gong...

Doctor: Oh...[We'll have] more organs of this type in April; anyway, this kind of organ is on the rise...

Investigator: Why will you get more organs in April?

Doctor: I can't tell you that, because that involves...it's not that...it's not necessary to explain these things to you, there is no way to explain...

Case 3: (A hospital in Guangzhou City)

Investigator: How long do I have to wait [for a kidney transplant]?

Doctor: We can do the surgery about one week after you arrive.

Investigator: But I want the kidney to be healthy, fresh and live, it's not from a cadaver, is it?

Doctor: Of course it's good!

Investigator: Is there any that's provided by Falun Gong practitioners...

Doctor: That's what we have here.

Case 4: (A medical university in Tianjin City)

Investigator: The doctor said the source of this kidney is good, because he (the donor) practiced qigong; I asked what kind of qigong, [he said] Falun Gong. So those people who practice Falun Gong have good health?

Response: Of course, we have a similar situation here...We also have organs from [people who were still] breathing and whose hearts were beating...Of course, the organ's quality is a very important element, which is to say the donor is young, and the time between when the blood circulation is cut off and when the organ is removed is very short, or even absent. In this situation, the blood circulation is not cut off, which is definitely good for long-term recovery, that's for sure...

C. Where Are Those Missing Falun Dafa Practitioners?

In the nearly seven years after the CCP started persecuting Falun Gong, Falun Gong practitioners have been continuously arrested and detained without legal reason. The number of detained practitioners is well into the hundreds of thousands. Many practitioners who went to Beijing to peacefully appeal refused to give their names and addresses in order to resist the persecution, and also because they didn't want their work units and local officials to be affected. They were detained in secret and their whereabouts are unknown. Maybe they had their organs harvested before they could give their names, and the CCP regarded their bodies as "unidentified" at cremation.

Mr. Guo Guoting, a lawyer temporarily living outside of China, said he personally took a case about Huang Xiong, which is similar to the situation described above. Huang Xiong disappeared from his dormitory at Shanghai Jiao Tong University and was not heard from for two or three years. Mr. Guo Guoting and others searched many places, but could not find him. Since it is said that 6,000 Falun Gong practitioners were once held at Sujiatun, they were probably involved in the same kind of incident as Huang Xiong.

According to a report on the Clearwisdom website, in early 2001, groups of practitioners from all over China came to Beijing to call for an end to the persecution against Falun Gong. Many were arrested. Those who refused to give their names and addresses at the Tiananmen Police Department were savagely tortured and sent to various detention centers in Beijing. After December 20, 2000, the number of practitioners sent to detention centers suddenly increased to dozens or even over a hundred each day. The guards said to the practitioners who refused to give their information, "We'll send you to a place where you will tell." In early 2001, groups of practitioners were sent away in big buses in the early morning every other day. An 18-year-old girl from Shandong Province shared the same cell with the author of the article, who is also a Falun Gong practitioner. Her number was K28. One morning her number was called by mistake. She got on the bus, but later returned. She said all of the practitioners were being taken to Northeastern China. Later, the guards openly told us that they were sending the practitioners to Northeastern China. According to witnesses, as many as 60 buses went to Northeastern China on January 1 and January 2, 2001, and each bus carried more than 40 Falun Gong practitioners. The illegally detained Falun Gong practitioners became a live organ pool.

The Clearwisdom website also reported on the disappearance of Falun Gong practitioners, such as the following two cases:

Mr. Zhang Wenliang from Zunhua City, Hebei Province was born in October 1945. In early November 2000, he clarified the truth about Falun Gong. He left Zhangjiakou City and went to Beijing to appeal and has never returned.

Falun Gong practitioner Ms. Li Ruihuan, about 60 years old, lived at No 42-5-301 in Huaxing Neighborhood District in Shijiazhuang City, Hebei Province. On January 13, 2002, she went to Beijing to appeal for Falun Gong and was arrested by police. She was taken to Fengtai District Detention Center and was savagely beaten by guards. No one has ever seen or heard from her since.

4. CCP Denies Existence of Camp; Journalists Invited to Investigate

A. Late Response

When the concentration camps were exposed, quite unusually, it took the CCP three weeks to come out and deny the existence of the camps. The CCP claimed that the outside world should come and investigate the case. For those who understand the CCP even just a little would know that three weeks is enough to destroy all the evidences and arrange the outside to investigate the camps the way the CCP wants.

B. CCP Officials Lied

For this horrifying genocide, even for its three-week late response the CCP dared not put this response on all of its official websites. Why? Because of the CCP's deceptive nature. For example, Liu Zhengrong, deputy director of the Internet Bureau of the News Office of the State Department, lied about, "No one is incriminated for expressing one's opinion on the Internet," and on June 14, 1999, the spokesperson of the Appeals Bureau of the Central Office and State Department Office said, "We will not persecute Falun Gong."

C. Lies about Investigation

It is common for the CCP to breach an agreement. In 1998, Delon Humann, Secretary of the World Medical Association, Anders Milton, its chairman, and Dr. T J Moon of the Korean Medical Association, visited Beijing and reached an agreement with the Chinese Medical Association to investigate the issue of China using organs from executed prisoners' jointly with a goal of stopping it. In 2000, China breached the agreement and refused to cooperate.

Recently the Falun Dafa Association and Clearwisdom.net established the "The Coalition to Investigate the Persecution of Falun Gong in China (CIPFG)." The Coalition has announced its independent and comprehensive investigation on the persecution against Falun Gong starting from the first revealed organ transplant concentration camp: Sujiatun. UN special envoys will investigate the Sujiatun incident. Sound of Hope Radio Station also applied to join the investigation. However, whether they will make it to their trips and truly start their investigations depend on whether the CCP's invitation is real or fake.

D. Large Underground World in Shenyang City

Qin Gang, spokesperson of the CCP's Foreign Ministry, questioned the investigation, "How could a hospital lock up 6,000 people?" However, the witness was actually talking about the underground buildings behind the hospital. How many people can hide in there then? On March 29, 2006, Shenyang Daily published an article, "Searching Shenyang's Underground World." In the report, it said that there were 1,080,000 square meters (~267 acres) of underground buildings in Shenyang and there were hospitals there. That report disappeared from the CCP governed websites on April 1.

5. Other Evidence - The CCP's 610 Office Recently Issued Urgent Notice

The CCP's 610 Office issued an emergency notice asking all offices to report lists of all dead Falun Gong practitioners. Why was this order issued at the very time Sujiatun was exposed and why was it issued in such a hurry?

III. Exactly What Evidence Do You Need?

1. Live Evidence?

If you want live evidence, we don't currently have it. However, did you know...

A. The Auschwitz Concentration Camp was built in 1940. Although it was known during World War II, the first to obtain live evidence was the Soviet army when it entered the camp on January 27, 1945.

B. The first to reveal the Nazi's secret gas chamber was Lieutenant Kurt Gerstein. When he found Pope Pius XII's ambassador in Berlin and told him about the massacre in the concentration camp, hoping that the Pope would take a stand to stop it, the response he got from the Pope's ambassador was, "Please get out! Please get out!"

C. In October 1942, an urgent message was sent by a Jewish organization to western countries such as Great Britain and the United States: The Polish Jews are being massacred. Before leaving Poland, the person carrying this message passed into the Belzec Extermination Camp. Although it was only for an hour, the horrifying scene he saw stayed with him his entire life. His name was Jan Karski. When he told President Franklin D. Roosevelt and other high government officials about the horror within the concentration camp, no one believed him, including the American Jewish leader. One of the U.S. Supreme Court judges, Felix Frankfurter, asked, "Do you know who I am? Do you know that I, myself, am a Jew?" "A person like me must be completely honest. Therefore, I must tell you that I cannot believe what you said."

When the Allied forces captured the formerly Nazi occupied territory, people couldn't help but face such a fact: The Nazis killed over three million Polish Jews.

2. Reverse Burden of Proof Is in the Law

The popular interpretation of "burden of proof" is that whoever proposes any position should present evidence to support his position. If one party accuses another party of something, the accuser should provide evidence to validate his accusation. In modern civilized societies, however, under certain circumstances, the responsibility to present evidence is reversed. If the accuser has circumstantial evidence and traces of evidence, he can propose the indictment, while the accused must provide concrete evidence to prove his innocence. If the accused fails to do so, there is reason to believe that he is guilty.

Reversal of the burden of proof is usually applied when the accused is in possession of, or monopolizes, the evidence. One example is medical accidents: the patient may lack medical knowledge and evidence, but if he was treated and harmed at a hospital, he can press charges against that hospital, while the hospital bears the burden of proof and has to show that it was not responsible for the harm done to the patient.

Reversal of the burden of proof does stand in these situations on the basis of justice and moral principles. A civilized society prevents those with power from harming and exploiting less powerful groups. Since the CCP is a violent, totalitarian regime that brutalizes its people and blocks information, reversal of the burden of proof becomes absolutely necessary in order to uphold justice.

Attorney Guo Guoting explained the issue of onus probandi (burden of proof): Under special circumstances, reverse onus probandi is also set by the law. For example, in administrative proceedings, a citizen files a lawsuit against an official--a governed party files a lawsuit against a governing party, a country, or an administration. Then the legal statuses of these two parties are different. The law should consider the balance of power. In administrative proceedings what is adopted is known as reverse onus probandi. That is to say the burden of proof lies with the defendant, not the plaintiff. Along the same line of reasoning, reverse onus probandi can also be adapted in CCP's persecution of Falun Gong. If the CCP cannot produce evidence, so far no one who entered the concentration camp has made it out alive, and the CCP does not allow independent investigation, how can one obtain live evidence?

IV. If You Don't Want Others to Know, You Shouldn't Do It in the First Place

The CCP will use all means to eliminate evidences. However, it would never escape the fate of being punished by history. Does the CCP dare to provide the names, affiliations, transplant times, doctors that did the operations and legal documents for the donors? Does CCP dare to provide the name list of Falun Gong practitioners that have been missing? The facts cannot be covered by just transferring Falun Gong practitioners to other places or painting the walls. The dead may not be able to function as witnesses. But can the CCP kill all those who participated? The truth will for sure be revealed. What's done by night appears by day.

V. Answers to Inquires

1. Only Certain Level Hospitals Can Do Kidney Transplant Operations

The "Across the Society" program on Canton Satellite TV has reported the death of a Hong Kong civilian Wang Nianwen, who died of a kidney transplant failure in Guangzhou. The operation was performed in Yanling Hospital of Canton (Guangdong) Province. Usually surgeons in the urinary department perform the transplant, but none of the surgeons in this case were from the urinary department. The chief surgeon, Cheng Gang, is a plastic surgeon according to the clinic at Zhongshan Hospital and he does not have a license required to do a kidney transplant. According to the content of civil defense statement made by Zhongshan Hospital, it "has no cooperation with Yanling Hospital." Therefore, the transfer of Mr. Wang to Yanling Hospital was not authorized action by Zhongshan Hospital.

Looking from the TV coverage, it was not the first time that Yanling Hospital performed such transplant operations. The reason the case was exposed was because Mr. Wang died.

On June 5, 2005, the website Sina.com quoted a report from the "Southern Daily" with the title "The First Regulation on Organ Transplant in China Will Come Out Soon." In the report, vice minister of Health, Huang Jiefu, also stated affirmatively that "in the future hospitals at county or township level will not be allowed to perform organ transplants," and "at present it's not mandatory that only one designated hospital in a certain area can do organ transplants. But there must be an admittance system and only hospitals with such capacity can be allowed to do it." We must pay attention to this statement, Huang Jiefu said, "in the future hospitals at county or township level will not be allowed to perform organ transplants," which implies that at present county-level hospitals are performing organ transplants. What level is a county or township hospital at?!

2. Never Heard of Sujiatun Concentration Camp

Would the CCP publicize its formation of concentration camps? Records of "Investigation International" show that hospital staff and doctors who have been involved in transplants from Henan, Shandong, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Beijing, Tianjin, Liaoning and Hubei told investigators that organs from Falun Gong practitioners can be provided. A conclusion can be made from summary preliminary investigation results of "Investigation International," that there is more than one concentration camp in China where Falun Gong practitioners are used as live donors of organs. Further more, concentration camps can be found in over half of the country. The third witness has gone so far as to claim that Sujiatun is one of 36 concentration camps in China. A report states that "the man-made defense in Shenyang city is top-notch in China." Recently the State Department granted RMB90 million to construct subways, man-made defense systems, underground shopping centers and other integrated underground systems in Shenyang. However, such a leading city's website (http://www.lnmf.gov.cn/) cannot be accessed after the Sujiatun incident was exposed. When searching the website, it was found that the website of "Liaoning Province Office of Man-Made Defense"(www.lnmf.gov.cn/main/gjxw.jsp) which was on-line and available a few hours ago is now unavailable. Why?

VI. The Trial of Conscience

There is a "Holocaust Museum" in Washington DC. At the end of a book about the background of the museum, visitors have jotted down their feelings after their visit: "They appealed not to let it happen again!"

Genocide could happen during war, and could happen at other times. While we are shouting "Never again," the racial massacre in Rwanda happened as well, the massacres by the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia also occurred, and massacres have been taken place in mainland China. During the Rwanda racial massacre, which began in April of 1994, one million people were killed in 100 days. It shocked the entire world. However, in mainland China, during the 1,000 days since autumn of 1959, at least 30,000,000 people died of famine, the deaths far outnumbered the casualties of 12,780,000 during the anti-Japanese War, it also outnumbered the 6,000,000 Jews killed in the Second World War. Compared with the Rwanda massacre, the daily average number of deaths, the time it lasted, and the scale of the killing in China far outnumbered those of Rwanda. Under the CCP's regime, how could such a large-scale massacre last for three years?

The reason that such atrocities happened is not only because of wicked people, but also because the good people just standby without taking action.

If we are to wait until the massacre is over and all evidences destroyed before we shout: "Never again," how are we supposed to face the dead and what kind of trial on our conscience will there be?

Chinese version available at http://minghui.org/mh/articles/2006/4/6/124565.html

 Yearly Archive   Printer Version