By a Falun Dafa practitioner in Hong Kong

(Clearwisdom.net) The Singapore false charges case is scheduled for a court hearing at the Court of Appeals on September 25, 2006. I want to share some of my thoughts.

The Singapore false charges case is the dark minions, rotten demons, and the communist evil specters in other dimensions manipulating the ordinary people to persecute Singapore Falun Dafa practitioners, including practitioners involved in the case and all practitioners in Singapore. I think fellow practitioners may be quite clear on this point, but there might be some exceptions of practitioners in Singapore still realizing that this is persecution against Dafa and practitioners. This persecution is being carried out via judicial methods. If we lose the lawsuit, the Singapore government will restrict the Singapore practitioners' truth-clarification efforts even more and other Fa-validation activities as well. They will thereby achieve their purpose of assisting the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in the persecution of Falun Gong.

Just because of this, in my opinion, we will unwittingly be attached to the result of the case and be afraid of losing the lawsuit. We will consequently be inclined to put most of our efforts into the details of the judicial process itself, including sending forth righteous thoughts at the court. We will easily be dragged [down] by the evil the old forces have arranged. Actually, besides sending forth righteous thoughts at the court, we should make even more use of this case to clarify the truth and extensively expose the evil to the Singapore government, the judicial system, the media, the political parties, organizations, and the general public. We should base ourselves from a correct standpoint, no matter what the result of the legal action. We should do what we are supposed to do. We should cherish this opportunity, expose the evil and the persecution, and walk every step correctly in the process.

I hereby suggest that the Singapore Falun Dafa Association coordinate and arrange activities that can be carried out while the court hearings are taking place, including sending forth righteous thoughts, distributing flyers, clarifying the truth to people in different places, and other forms of Fa promoting activities. Sharing on the Fa is certainly indispensable. The content of the flyers should include an introduction relating to the case. Other activities should help practitioners coming from other countries make full use of their capabilities in Singapore.

In addition, I want to say something about the media. The majority of the Singapore media is state-controlled and has so far played a very negative role in this case. Because of this, we may even put more hope on (or be attached to) the media's attention and reporting. The evil may take advantage of our loophole and make the media react even worse. So we do not need to be attached to how other media report us, but we must clarify the truth to them. We should pay more attention to our own media and be confident. Our own media should give weight to our own matters and do well. For example, at press conferences, our media should be more prominent--at least their logos should be seen. This is not simply a matter of form but a reflection of the concern we have for our own.

We should also look within to find our own shortcomings: whether or not the Singapore practitioners have some loopholes as a whole body; whether or not we have encouraged and brought more practitioners to join group Fa study and experience sharing; whether or not conflicts and divisions between practitioners are still very serious. I think it's time for these problems to be resolved. When we can form a formidable entity and eliminate divisions and conflicts, the evil will self-destruct.

Finally, I'd like to suggest that Singapore practitioners update and publish articles on Clearwisdom.net chronicling the development of the case and related activities as well as sharing on the Fa, so that all practitioners around the world will be able to understand the situation in a timely manner and be able to cooperate and put forward suggestions.

The above is my personal opinion. Please point out anything inappropriate.

Posting date: 9/27/2006
Original article date: 9/26/2006
Category: Practitioners' Insights
Translated on 9/25/2006
Chinese version available at http://minghui.org/mh/articles/2006/9/22/138375.html

 Yearly Archive  Printer Version