![]() | ||||
|
Court Sentences Hong Kong Practitioner Ms. Zeng Aihua to Prison Without Notifying Her Family or Attorney
(Clearwisdom.net) In March of 2007, Hong Kong Falun Dafa practitioner Ms.
Zeng Aihua was tried and sentenced to three years in prison. She appealed, but
the Shanghai No. 1 Middle People's Court rejected her appeal. She was tried a
second time, but the court did not notify her family or attorney. Ms. Zeng was
taken to Shanghai Women's Prison on April 16. To conceal their criminal act, the Shanghai 610 Office and the
Public Security Bureau secretly manipulated Zeng Aihua's second trial. One month
after the second trial her family and attorney were still kept completely in the
dark and did not know anything about it. Ms. Zeng Aihua's family and attorney saw her in court in February 2007 during
the first trial, but they were unable to see her or get any information about
her after that. The Public Security Bureau deliberately arranged her first trial
to be before the New Year (February 12) so that her 10-day-appeal period would
fall on the holidays. The court was closed during this time, and on-call
personnel would not answer anything related to her case. Since it has to be the
defendant who initiates the appeal, her family and attorney were very worried
that Zeng Aihua might not know this and they could not deliver the message to
her. After the New Year, they found out that Zeng Aihua had indeed filed her
appeal to the Shanghai No. 1 Middle People's Court. Ms. Zeng's attorney, Wen Haipo requested that personnel at the Shanghai
Pudongxinqu Court, where she was sentenced, send the case material and all the
related letters to him at the No. 1 Middle People's Court. His request was
unjustifiably rejected. During the next two months, attorney Wen Haipo had no choice but to keep
calling the No. 1 Middle People's Court, which was handling the case. Each time
he was told that they did not receive the case, so Zeng Aihua lost the chance
for her attorney to defend her. On April 20, Zeng Aihua's family received a letter from Zeng at the Shanghai
Women's Prison. It was the first letter her family had received since she was
arrested on May 23, 2006. They realized that she had been sent to prison several
days earlier. Her family called the Shanghai No. 1 Middle People's Court and inquired about
the case. They were told that the second trial was over, and the Judge's name
was Chen Li. Chen Li admitted that the court decided not to open the court, and
that she just read through the case, without seeing Zeng Aihua or the witness.
She claimed that during the week of March 7-15, no attorney had contacted them
about the case, so they did not notify her attorney. The defense was only from
Zeng Aihua's written appeal, which made just one point, that Falun Dafa is not
an [Jiang Zemin's slanderous term deleted]. Chen Li claimed that she had
no choice but to reject the appeal and keep the original verdict. When Zeng's family asked Chen Li on what grounds she kept the original
verdict, she was ambiguous and vaguely stated that it was based on the law
written by the people's delegate, but could not tell the family which exact law.
Chen Li asked the family to look it up themselves online. Her family asked why
they never received any notification even one month after the verdict. Chen Li
stated that the verdict had been sent on March 15 to the local Puxing Road
Police Station which handles the district where Zeng's temporary address is,
Pudongxinqu 780 Wulian Road. The police were supposed to deliver the verdict in
person to the family. When Zeng's family called the police station, they spoke to several officers,
all of whom seemed quite nervous and they kept changing their story. First they
refused to answer any questions over phone, then they told her family they could
come to the police station in person to inquire. They repeatedly stated that the
policeman who should have delivered the letter was named Qiu Lin and he was out
on business, so they would have to wait until he returned from the trip, while
in actuality he was at the police station when the phone call took place. The
next day, police at the station gave their final answer: They never received the
verdict. The court insisted that they had sent out the verdict, yet the police
station denied that they received it. No one would take responsibility for the
verdict from the second trial. The entire event was a big blow to Zeng Aihua's family. They could not
believe that their loved one was deprived of her right of defense. Since the
evil Chinese Communist Party (CCP) did not notify them of the verdict, they only
knew of the results because of her letter from prison. They raised a strong
protest against the illegal trial and the secret cover-up. From the information we received, cases like Zeng's are quite common in
Shanghai. There were several cases involving Falun Dafa practitioners who were
not given open court hearings for their second trial, and no notification was
given to the attorneys or families, even after the practitioners were sentenced
to prison. Most of them found out via their loved one's letter from prison.
There are two middle courts in Shanghai, No. 1 and 2 Middle People's Court, and
similar cases have appeared in both courts. They are directly manipulated by the
City Public Security Bureau and 610 Office. The CCP knows the verdicts are completely illegal, which is why they used all
means to cover up the cases, deprive the practitioners of their rights of
defense, and failed to notify the families. It was to reduce the possibility of
tarnishing the reputation of the CCP in society. Zeng Aihua is being held in Shanghai Women's Prison No. 5 Battalion, No. 1
District. There are many Falun Dafa practitioners held there. Relevant phone numbers: Shanghai No. 1 Middle People's Court Posting date: 5/11/2007
feedback@clearwisdom.net |
|||||||