Clarifying the Truth in Hong Kong
By a practitioner in Taiwan
(Clearwisdom.net) In the past, I traveled to Hong Kong frequently, but it
was seldom due to my work. A short time ago, I heard that Hong Kong was running
short of help from fellow practitioners in Taiwan for two reasons. One was
because the Hong Kong government had been repatriating practitioners who
constantly stayed in Hong Kong, and the other was that it was difficult for
Taiwan practitioners to acquire a visa. Because Hong Kong practitioners severely
lacked manpower, I considered going there. And later, after reading some
experience-sharing articles, which stated that the current situation in Hong
Kong offers opportunities for those who seldom do truth
clarification there, I made up my mind to go. Later however, I started to wonder whether Hong Kong practitioners should
instead encourage local fellow practitioners to actively clarify the truth and
not rely on Taiwan practitioners. I also thought that Hong Kong practitioners
weren't doing enough truth clarification in their own areas. Consequently, I
began having second thoughts about going to Hong Kong. One day when I was studying the Fa, I came across what Teacher said, "As your Master, I have never kept account of the wrong things you
have done in your cultivation; I remember only the good things you have done
and your accomplishments." ("Pass the Deadly Test") I was ashamed of my previous thoughts. Even though fellow practitioners
aren't perfect in some respects, why should I let that sway my righteous
thoughts? Shouldn't I do my best to make the situation better instead of
pointing fingers at others? Furthermore, practitioners' understandings of the Fa
are based on their own levels, so how could I force my understanding onto those
fellow practitioners? I realized that my negative thinking about fellow
practitioners wasn't righteous. The current situation in Hong Kong is obviously one that is short handed of
practitioners. How could I treat myself as an outsider, comment on others' work,
tell someone to do this or that, but not take part in truth-clarification
activities myself? I knew I should go to Hong Kong, so I talked to a fellow
practitioner in charge of media projects, who agreed with me. A few days later I
arrived in Hong Kong. While in Hong Kong, I had a chance to clarify the truth in front of a big
jewelry building, where a considerable number of Chinese shopped every day. On
the second day after my arrival in Hong Kong, the huge earthquake struck in
Sichuan Province. With The Epoch Times in hand, I spoke to the people
loudly, "The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) doesn't value Chinese people's
lives! The CCP knew of the quake beforehand but didn't inform people. This is
the cause of these many deaths!" Many people from China were shocked, but a
small number didn't believe what was printed in the newspaper, claiming we were
exaggerating the facts. At one tourist site there were plenty of banners and billboards, which
presented information on the June 4, 1989 Tiananmen Massacre, organ harvesting
from Falun Gong practitioners, and the CCP staged self-immolation which was used
to frame Falun Gong. All of this information caught the attention of many
mainland Chinese people. For those who didn't believe our media reports, after I
explained the facts by using the pictures on the posters, they became receptive
to the truth. Almost every one of them eventually read our newspaper. Due to the
fact that we didn't print enough copies of the newspaper, I asked them not to
throw it away after reading it, but to return it to us. In doing so, each copy
of the newspaper was able to serve more readers. At the same time, we were able
to successfully persuade quite a few people to withdraw from the CCP and its
affiliated organizations. During my truth clarification in Hong Kong, I found myself becoming more
capable of clarifying the truth from the standpoint of the listeners. When they
had more time, I chatted with them using such questions as, "Which province
did you come from?" "Is this your first time in Hong Kong?" and
"What do you think of Hong Kong?" By doing so, I made the conversation
easygoing. When the people became relaxed and were willing to talk with me,
clarifying the truth to them was easy, and finally they usually readily agreed
to do the "three withdrawals." One more very important thing is that no matter how something turns out, we
shouldn't let our minds be swayed even if the listener's attitude is very bad.
Always remember to treat him or her with a constant smile and a compassionate
heart. The person may finally accept the truth. May 30, 2008
Chinese version available at
http://www.minghui.org/mh/articles/2008/5/31/179441.html
Yearly Archive
Printer Version
feedback@clearwisdom.net
|
Related Articles
|